This book describes the detailed processes and techniques essential for the scientific investigation of atrocity crimes. It includes methods for the location, evaluation, excavation, recovery, and recording of mass graves and the analysis of human remains and other evidence in order to establish the identity of victims and the cause and manner of their deaths. This volume establishes protocols and standard operating procedures to guide standards and approaches that can be used in both judicial and humanitarian contexts. The procedures for field and mortuary application are flexible and can be used to meet specific project aims, constraints, and contexts.
The phases of activity and detailed methodological approaches set out in this book describe components of a complex scientific process. Chapters examine the evaluation of possible sites, scene of crime management, health and safety, key roles, excavation of graves, forensic sciences, mortuary management, analysis of human remains, and antemortem data collection. Recommended recording forms are included on the accompanying CD.
Professor Margaret Cox is visiting professor at the University of Southampton and chief executive of the Inforce Foundation. Her forensic work has taken her to France, Belgium, Kosovo, Rwanda, Iraq, and Cyprus, and she regularly undertakes domestic casework in the United Kingdom. She is the author of numerous peer-reviewed publications and several books, including Forensic Archaeology: Advances in Theory and Practice (coauthored with Professor John Hunter) and Health and Disease in Britain: Prehistory to the Present (coauthored with Professor Charlotte Roberts).
Ambika Flavel is a forensic osteoarchaeologist with the Inforce Foundation. She has worked for many different international organisations and been involved in numerous international mass grave investigations in such places as the Former Yugoslavia, Guatemala, and Iraq. She has also contributed to training and capacity building programmes and in teaching field and laboratory techniques to university students, professionals, and law enforcement agencies.
Ian Hanson is a lecturer in forensic archaeology at Bournemouth University, UK. His experience in working on mass grave investigations and exhumations has taken him to Bosnia, Croatia, Guatemala, the DR Congo, the United Kingdom, the United States, Cyprus, Egypt, and the Sudan. He has worked as a professional archaeologist in Europe, Africa, the United States, and the Middle East and has served as a consultant to various agencies such as the ICTY, UN, FAFG, Kenyon International, and the police.
Joanna Laver is a crime scene investigator for Dorset Police, UK. She has worked as a professional archaeologist in the UK, South America, and Cyprus. Her experience as a forensic osteoarchaeologist has taken her to such places as Kosovo, Cyprus, and Iraq, and she has contributed to domestic cases in the UK. She has been involved in training and capacity building programmes, teaching field and laboratory techniques to students and professionals.
Roland Wessling is forensic science and operations manager for the Inforce Foundation. He has worked as a consultant for numerous organisations on atrocity crime investigations and exhumations in the Balkans, Cyprus, and Iraq and on domestic cases in Germany and Britain. He regularly contributes to capacity building and training programmes for students and professionals.
Margaret Cox
Inforce Foundation
Ambika Flavel
Inforce Foundation
Ian Hanson
Bournemouth University
Joanna Laver
Dorset Police Service
Roland Wessling
Inforce Foundation
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi
Cambridge University Press
32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10013–2473, USA
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521865876
© Alison Anderson, Caroline Barker, Tony Brown, Paul Cheetham, Derek Clark, Margaret Cox, Sarah Donnelly,
Ambika Flavel, Martin Hall, Ian Hanson, Tim Haynie, Michael Hedley, Peter Jones, Joanna Laver, Mary Lewis,
Louise Loe, Tim Loveless, Romina Manning, Jacqueline McKinley, David Oxlee, Alison Perman, Margaret
Samuels, David Schofield, Hendrik Scholtz, Jeanine Vellema, Mark Viner, Roland Wessling, Richard Wright, and
the Inforce Foundation 2008
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without
the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2008
Printed in the United States of America
A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library.
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
The scientific investigation of mass graves : towards protocols and standard operating procedures /
Margaret Cox …[et al.].
p. ; cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-521-86587-6 hardback
1. Forensic sciences – Standards. 2. Autopsy – Standards. 3. Criminal investigation.
4. Crime scene searches. 5. Mass burials. 6. War crimes.
I. Cox, Margaret, 1950–
[DNLM: 1. Forensic Anthropology – standards. 2. Autopsy – standards. 3. Exhumation – standards.
4. Homicide. 5. War Crimes. W 750S4165 2008]
RA1053.S33 2008
614′.1 – dc22 2007013561
ISBN 978-0-521-86587-6 hardback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for
the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or
third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication
and does not guarantee that any content on such
Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
This book is dedicated to all those who have pioneered the
application and development of the forensic sciences and crime
scene processes to mass grave investigations since the 1940s.
| List of Figures | page xvii | ||
| List of Tables | xxii | ||
| Acknowledgments | xxvii | ||
| List of Contributors | xxix | ||
| 1 | Introduction and context • MARGARET COX, AMBIKA FLAVEL , AND IAN HANSON | 1 | |
| 1.1 Rationale | 1 | ||
| 1.2 Scope, background planning, and flexibility | 3 | ||
| 1.3 Structure of this book | 6 | ||
| 1.4 Historical context | 7 | ||
| 1.5 Semantics | 9 | ||
| 1.6 Political and legal context | 12 | ||
| 1.7 Forensic science and the investigation of mass murder, disposal, and concealment | 15 | ||
| 1.8 Mass murder and disposal scenes | 19 | ||
| 1.9 The ethical context | 21 | ||
| 1.9.1 Overriding code of conduct | 24 | ||
| 1.9.2 Contractual and operational involvement | 24 | ||
| 1.9.3 Treatment of human remains in investigations, analysis, and research | 25 | ||
| 1.9.4 Acting as an expert witness | 25 | ||
| 1.9.5 Education and public liaison | 26 | ||
| 1.10 Concluding remarks | 26 | ||
| 1.11 Inforce Foundation recording forms | 26 | ||
| 1.11.1 Introduction | 26 | ||
| 1.11.2 Selecting the correct form | 27 | ||
| 1.11.3 The recording forms | 28 | ||
| I | Protocols for the location, excavation, and analysis of remains from mass graves and other deposition sites | ||
| 2 | Protocols for the investigation of mass graves • ALISON ANDERSON, MARGARET COX, AMBIKA FLAVEL, IAN HANSON, MICHAEL HEDLEY, JOANNA LAVER, ALISON PERMAN, MARK VINER, AND RICHARD WRIGHT | 39 | |
| 2.1 Standards and personnel | 39 | ||
| 2.2 Phase 1 – Site assessment and evaluation | 41 | ||
| 2.2.1 Planning | 43 | ||
| 2.2.2 Area or site preparation | 46 | ||
| 2.2.3 Area location | 47 | ||
| 2.2.4 Site location | 48 | ||
| 2.2.5 Site confirmation | 50 | ||
| 2.2.6 Evidence processing | 52 | ||
| 2.2.7 Documentation and recording | 53 | ||
| 2.2.8 Assessment completion | 53 | ||
| 2.2.9 Site integrity | 55 | ||
| 2.2.10 Information dissemination | 55 | ||
| 2.2.11 Evidence handover | 56 | ||
| 2.2.12 Summary: Phase 1 – Site assessment and evaluation | 56 | ||
| 2.3 Phase 2 – Site excavation and evidence recovery | 57 | ||
| 2.3.1 Planning | 59 | ||
| 2.3.2 Evidence processing | 62 | ||
| 2.3.3 Documentation and recording | 63 | ||
| 2.3.4 Site preparation | 63 | ||
| 2.3.5 Site investigation I: Surface evidence | 65 | ||
| 2.3.6 Site investigation Ⅱ: Site formation and grave exposure | 67 | ||
| 2.3.7 Site investigation Ⅲ: Excavation | 68 | ||
| 2.3.8 Completion of excavation | 71 | ||
| 2.3.9 Site closure | 72 | ||
| 2.3.10 Off-site analysis | 73 | ||
| 2.3.11 Final reports | 73 | ||
| 2.3.12 Information dissemination | 73 | ||
| 2.3.13 Evidence handover – Check | 74 | ||
| 2.3.14 Summary: Phase 2 – Site excavation and evidence recovery | 74 | ||
| 2.4 Phase 3 – The mortuary | 76 | ||
| 2.4.1 Planning | 77 | ||
| 2.4.2 Site preparation and commissioning | 81 | ||
| 2.4.3 Evidence management, integrity, and custody | 83 | ||
| 2.4.4 Postmortem examination | 87 | ||
| 2.4.5 Completion of the postmortem examination | 96 | ||
| 2.4.6 Final reports | 97 | ||
| 2.4.7 Case completion and closure of the mortuary | 97 | ||
| 2.4.8 Information dissemination | 98 | ||
| 2.4.9 Evidence handover | 98 | ||
| 2.4.10 Summary: Phase 3 – Mortuary process | 99 | ||
| 2.5 Appendix: Equipment lists | 102 | ||
| II | Standard operating procedures | ||
| 3 | Health and safety • ALISON ANDERSON, IAN HANSON, DAVID SCHOFIELD, HENDRIK SCHOLTZ, JEANINE VELLEMA, AND MARK VINER | 109 | |
| 3.1 Introduction | 109 | ||
| 3.1.1 Statement of intent | 110 | ||
| 3.2 General policy | 110 | ||
| 3.3 Legal requirements | 115 | ||
| 3.4 Health and safety in the field | 115 | ||
| 3.5 Health and safety in the mortuary | 120 | ||
| 3.5.1 Radiological safety in the mortuary | 123 | ||
| 3.5.2 Supervision of safety procedures | 124 | ||
| 3.5.3 Personal protective equipment | 126 | ||
| 3.5.4 Health and safety during postmortem examinations | 128 | ||
| 3.5.5 Disposal of waste | 132 | ||
| 3.5.6 Mortuary specification | 134 | ||
| 3.5.7 Other personnel | 135 | ||
| 3.5.8 Health and safety and the arrival of remains at the mortuary | 136 | ||
| 3.5.9 Decontamination and disinfectants and disinfection of the mortuary | 137 | ||
| 3.5.10 Clinical waste management | 139 | ||
| 3.5.11 Observation of postmortem examinations | 142 | ||
| 3.6 Documentation and recording: Risk assessment forms and logs | 143 | ||
| 3.7 Appendix: Health and safety legislation | 143 | ||
| 4 | Scene of crime examination • SARAH DONNELLY, MICHAEL HEDLEY, TIM LOVELESS, ROMINA MANNING, ALISON PERMAN, AND ROLAND WESSLING | 148 | |
| 4.1 Introduction | 148 | ||
| 4.1.1 Scene of crime manager | 149 | ||
| 4.1.2 Scene of crime examiner | 150 | ||
| 4.2 Field procedures | 150 | ||
| 4.2.1 Site integrity and continuity | 150 | ||
| 4.2.2 Evidence integrity and continuity | 151 | ||
| 4.3 Mortuary procedures | 159 | ||
| 4.3.1 Mortuary integrity and continuity | 159 | ||
| 4.3.2 Evidence integrity and continuity | 159 | ||
| 4.4 Forensic photography | 168 | ||
| 4.4.1 Photographic processes | 170 | ||
| 4.4.2 Digital image capture and handling | 174 | ||
| Protection of digital photographs | 175 | ||
| 4.5 Data storage and security | 175 | ||
| 4.5.1 Hardware and software | 176 | ||
| 4.5.2 Electronic data handling | 177 | ||
| 4.5.3 Postmortem database | 179 | ||
| 4.5.4 Laptop user policy and guide | 181 | ||
| 5 | Search, location, excavation, and recovery • PAUL CHEETHAM, MARGARET COX, AMBIKA FLAVEL , IAN HANSON, TIM HAYNIE, DAVID OXLEE, AND ROLAND WESSLING | 183 | |
| 5.1 Introduction | 183 | ||
| 5.1.1 Personnel and standards | 185 | ||
| 5.2 Approaches and phases | 189 | ||
| 5.2.1 Resources | 190 | ||
| 5.2.2 Climate and environment | 190 | ||
| 5.3 Area and site location | 190 | ||
| 5.3.1 Remote sensing and imagery | 196 | ||
| 5.3.2 Geophysical survey | 203 | ||
| 5.3.3 Other methods | 206 | ||
| 5.3.4 Key points | 211 | ||
| 5.4 Site confirmation | 211 | ||
| 5.4.1 Surface scatters | 211 | ||
| 5.4.2 Site assessment | 212 | ||
| 5.5 Forensic archaeological excavation | 216 | ||
| 5.5.1 Forensic sites and archaeology | 218 | ||
| 5.5.2 Survey | 219 | ||
| 5.5.3 Grave preparation and protection | 229 | ||
| 5.5.4 Excavation | 234 | ||
| 5.5.5 Recovering forensic evidence | 243 | ||
| 5.5.6 Excavation techniques | 246 | ||
| 5.5.7 Other forensic contexts for mass disposal of human remains | 252 | ||
| 5.6 Excavation of human remains | 254 | ||
| 5.6.1 Excavation of human remains procedures | 255 | ||
| 5.6.2 Documentation and recording responsibilities | 258 | ||
| 5.6.3 Recovery of human remains | 259 | ||
| 5.6.4 Excavation of human remains: Summary | 263 | ||
| 5.7 Sampling and sieving | 264 | ||
| 5.8 Site preservation and restoration | 265 | ||
| 5.9 Documentation and recording: Field forms and logs | 266 | ||
| 6 | Mortuary procedures I – Pathology, radiography, and the role of the anatomical pathology technologist • ALISON ANDERSON, HENDRIK SCHOLTZ, JEANINE VELLEMA, AND MARK VINER | 268 | |
| 6.1 Introduction | 268 | ||
| 6.2 Property and exhibits | 270 | ||
| 6.3 Role and duties of the forensic pathologist | 271 | ||
| 6.3.1 Medicolegal postmortem examination | 271 | ||
| 6.3.2 Features contributing to the identification of the deceased | 273 | ||
| 6.3.3 Establishing the cause and manner of death | 275 | ||
| 6.3.4 Guidelines on issuing death certificates | 277 | ||
| 6.3.5 Specimen collection and sampling | 278 | ||
| 6.3.6 Body and specimen/sample storage | 282 | ||
| 6.4 Role and responsibilities of the anatomical pathology technologist | 283 | ||
| 6.4.1 Medicolegal duties | 283 | ||
| 6.4.2 Reconstruction of the body | 284 | ||
| 6.4.3 Viewing for identification purposes | 284 | ||
| 6.4.4 Skeletonised remains | 285 | ||
| 6.5 Role and responsibilities of the forensic radiographer | 286 | ||
| 6.5.1 Personnel | 286 | ||
| 6.5.2 Examination procedure | 286 | ||
| 6.5.3 Equipment and storage | 289 | ||
| 6.5.4 Recording | 291 | ||
| 6.6 Documentation and recording: Mortuary forms and logs | 292 | ||
| 7 | Mortuary procedures Ⅱ – Skeletal analysis I: Basic procedures and demographic assessment • CAROLINE BARKER, MARGARET COX, AMBIKA FLAVEL , JOANNA LAVER, AND LOUISE LOE | 295 | |
| 7.1 Introduction | 295 | ||
| 7.2 Basic procedures | 297 | ||
| 7.2.1 Defleshing, cleaning, and handling human skeletal remains | 297 | ||
| 7.2.2 Distinguishing human from nonhuman skeletal and dental remains | 301 | ||
| 7.2.3 Reconstruction of human skeletal remains | 304 | ||
| 7.2.4 Determination of the minimum number of individuals and the examination of commingled skeletal remains and body parts | 305 | ||
| 7.2.5 Application of population-specific methods | 308 | ||
| 7.3 Assessment of taphonomic change | 311 | ||
| 7.3.1 Types of taphonomic change | 312 | ||
| 7.3.2 Water and taphonomic change | 316 | ||
| 7.3.3 Assessing and recording bone surface changes | 318 | ||
| 7.4 Estimation of ancestry | 322 | ||
| 7.4.1 Visual assessment of ancestry | 323 | ||
| 7.4.2 Osteometric assessment of ancestry | 327 | ||
| 7.5 Assessment of biological sex | 328 | ||
| 7.5.1 Morphological methods for estimating biologial sex | 332 | ||
| 7.5.2 Metrical analysis for estimating biologial sex | 335 | ||
| 7.5.3 Disorders of sexual differentiation | 336 | ||
| 7.6 Assessment of parturition | 342 | ||
| 7.6.1 Methodology and recording | 344 | ||
| 7.7 Estimation of age at death | 344 | ||
| 7.7.1 Ageing nonadults | 345 | ||
| 7.7.2 Ageing adults | 367 | ||
| 7.7.3 Recording | 382 | ||
| 8 | Mortuary procedures Ⅲ – Skeletal analysis 2: Techniques for determining identity • CAROLINE BARKER, MARGARET COX, AMBIKA FLAVEL, JOANNA LAVER, MARY LEWIS, AND JACQUELINE MCKINLEY | 383 | |
| 8.1 Introduction | 383 | ||
| 8.2 Estimation of stature | 384 | ||
| 8.2.1 Stature estimation from the complete skeleton | 385 | ||
| 8.2.2 Stature estimation from complete long bones | 386 | ||
| 8.2.3 Relative stature | 390 | ||
| 8.3 Assessment of skeletal pathology and trauma | 391 | ||
| 8.3.1 Skeletal pathology | 396 | ||
| 8.3.2 Skeletal trauma | 397 | ||
| 8.4 Examination of dentition | 410 | ||
| 8.5 Assessment of heat-modified remains | 418 | ||
| 8.5.1 Analytical techniques | 420 | ||
| 8.5.2 Assessment of demography, pathology, and trauma in burnt bone | 424 | ||
| 8.6 Assessment of handedness | 425 | ||
| 8.7 Sampling tissue for analysis by external laboratories | 426 | ||
| 8.8 Metrical analysis | 430 | ||
| 8.8.1 Measurement of nonadult skeletons | 432 | ||
| 8.8.2 Measurement of adult skeletons | 434 | ||
| 8.9 Documentation and quality control | 459 | ||
| 8.9.1 Recording and documentation | 459 | ||
| 8.9.2 Quality control | 459 | ||
| 8.9.3 Recording forms | 461 | ||
| 9 | Forensic sciences • MARTIN HALL , TONY BROWN, PETER JONES, AND DEREK CLARK | 463 | |
| 9.1 Forensic entomology | 463 | ||
| 9.1.1 Introduction | 463 | ||
| 9.1.2 Equipment for insect collecting | 465 | ||
| 9.1.3 Collection of insect samples | 468 | ||
| 9.1.4 Killing and preservation of insect specimens | 471 | ||
| 9.1.5 Maintenance of living larvae | 473 | ||
| 9.1.6 Recording | 474 | ||
| 9.1.7 Summary points | 474 | ||
| 9.2 Environmental sampling | 475 | ||
| 9.2.1 Introduction | 475 | ||
| 9.2.2 Soil and sediment | 475 | ||
| 9.2.3 Sampling | 477 | ||
| 9.2.4 Analytical methodology: Macroscopic | 478 | ||
| 9.2.5 Analytical methodology: Palynomorphs | 478 | ||
| 9.2.6 Analytical methodology: Mineralogy and geochemistry | 481 | ||
| 9.2.7 Conclusions | 482 | ||
| 9.3 DNA analysis | 482 | ||
| 9.3.1 Introduction | 482 | ||
| 9.3.2 Rationale | 483 | ||
| 9.3.3 DNA quality and quantity | 485 | ||
| 9.3.4 Sampling from bodies | 485 | ||
| 9.3.5 Field preservation of samples | 486 | ||
| 9.3.6 Sample verification | 487 | ||
| 9.3.7 Contamination issues | 487 | ||
| 9.3.8 Recording, packing, labelling, and transporting | 489 | ||
| 9.4 Forensic odontology | 490 | ||
| 9.4.1 Introduction | 490 | ||
| 9.4.2 Personnel | 490 | ||
| 9.4.3 Procedure for dental identification | 491 | ||
| 9.4.4 Age assessment in neonates and infants | 492 | ||
| 9.4.5 Forensic odontological examination and recording | 492 | ||
| 9.4.6 Collection of antemortem records | 496 | ||
| 10 | Antemortem data collection: Interaction with families and communities • MARGARET SAMUELS | 498 | |
| 10.1 Introduction | 498 | ||
| 10.2 Antemortem data collection | 499 | ||
| 10.2.1 Engaging informants | 501 | ||
| 10.2.2 Data collection tool | 502 | ||
| 10.2.3 Engaging appropriate staff | 502 | ||
| 10.2.4 Elements of an antemortem data tool | 503 | ||
| 10.2.5 Informant rights and terminating the interview | 507 | ||
| 10.3 Viewing human remains and clothing | 507 | ||
| 10.4 Traumatic events and reactions | 508 | ||
| 10.5 What can the forensic team and helping professional do? | 511 | ||
| 10.6 The professionals’ own reactions | 513 | ||
| Bibliography | 517 | ||
| Index | 543 | ||
| 2–1 | Flow chart of the site assessment process. | page 42 |
| 2–2 | Flow chart of personnel associated with the site assessment process. | 45 |
| 2–3 | Flow chart of the excavation and evidence recovery process. | 58 |
| 2–4 | Flow chart of personnel associated with site excavation and evidence recovery process. | 61 |
| 2–5 | A multiple mass grave site in the Former Yugoslavia where imported material was dumped in piles across a grave site presumably to disguise the graves. | 66 |
| 2–6 | Careful excavation around the edges of grave sites can reveal important evidence such as tyre tracks associated with transporting bodies to graves. | 69 |
| 2–7 | Flow chart of the mortuary process. | 77 |
| 2–8 | Flow chart of personnel associated with the mortuary process. | 79 |
| 2–9 | Example of a mortuary layout demonstrating clean and dirty areas. | 81 |
| 3–1 | Evidence recovered during the investigation of a mass grave site in the Former Yugoslavia strongly suggested that the area had previously been used as a chemical weapons testing site. | 118 |
| 4–1 | Tarpaulins are effective and useful temporary protective covers for mass graves. | 152 |
| 4–2 | The day and date recorded from Seiko automatic watches served as strong evidence in dating events in the Srebrenica Massacre. | 154 |
| 4–3 | The unscientific excavation of mass graves will always fail to recover all evidence. | 157 |
| 4–4 | Blindfolds can trap hair in the knot. | 172 |
| 5–1 | In the Former Yugoslavia some victims’ remains were buried in local cemeteries. | 185 |
| 5–2 | Sand quarry north of Najaf, Iraq. | 186 |
| 5–3 | The local community at Nyamata, Rwanda, recovered human remains from a backfilled latrine to a depth of 9 m. | 187 |
| 5–4 | In Ntarama, Rwanda, this massacre site has become a focus for genocide tourism. | 193 |
| 5–5 | Photogaphs have been taken of the dead, mass graves, and excavations since cameras were developed. | 194 |
| 5–6 | Aerial imagery taken by NATO for military reconnaissance purposes over Srebrenica in July 1995. | 197 |
| 5–7 | Imagery released in August 1995 showing machines excavating graves at Branjevo Farm, dating the Srebrenica Massacre. | 199 |
| 5–8 | Inforce personnel using GPR in Iraq to search for anomalies that pinpointed potential grave sites in an area located by local witnesses. | 204 |
| 5–9 | Forensic landscape – features in the landscape often have significance to perpetrators. | 207 |
| 5–10 | Vegetation growth over an area of soil disturbance following the creation of a mass grave. | 209 |
| 5–11 | Plants growing in a quarry used as an execution site in Bosnia were crushed beneath victims. | 210 |
| 5–12 | Trenching to locate graves. | 213 |
| 5–13 | Surface stripping can provide a clear outline of the grave structure without intrusive trenching. | 215 |
| 5–14 | The survival of materials in this grave demonstrates the variability of preservation that can occur. | 219 |
| 5–15 | Baseline perpendicular measurements are a rapid way of plotting points. | 220 |
| 5–16 | Triangulation from a baseline is a more accurate method for rapidly plotting points. | 221 |
| 5–17 | Grid measurement allows accurate and systematic recording of an area, but is difficult to apply when heavy machinery is in the area. | 222 |
| 5–18 | The surveyor’s level provides a remote station for reading heights to augment baseline 2-D survey, and can be used to measure distance and angles. | 223 |
| 5–19 | Using a total station allows remote, rapid 3-D surveying. | 224 |
| 5–20 | Survey of anatomical landmarks allows simple ‘stick figure’ representation for 3-D survey manipulation. | 225 |
| 5–21 | Munitions such as cluster bomblets will regularly fail to explode on impact and are dispersed in areas that are marked as free from munitions on military plans. | 229 |
| 5–22 | Perpetrators do not normally check for services before digging a grave. | 231 |
| 5–23 | A deep grave showing the ground works and engineering that may be required to safely excavate a mass grave. | 232 |
| 5–24 | Small 360 excavators are useful for operating in and around a grave; backhoes are useful for moving spoil and site preparation. | 234 |
| 5–25 | The ICTY excavation at the ‘Dam’ site near Petkovci. | 235 |
| 5–26 | An undisturbed grave with no space between bodies to allow the team to work within the grave structure may require the removal of one or more grave walls. | 238 |
| 5–27 | A partially filled or robbed grave with space between bodies and groups of bodies allows effective excavation without removing walls or damaging remains. | 239 |
| 5–28 | Stratigraphic excavation maximises evidence recovery and stratigraphic understanding. | 241 |
| 5–29 | In forensic cases, when the grave outline has been identified, the backfilled soil is removed in arbitrary spits. | 242 |
| 5–30 | A deep grave showing the evidence and features that are regularly preserved on the surface of the grave structure. | 244 |
| 5–31 | Recovery of machine tool marks can provide data on the make and type of machine, as well as individuating the machine used itself. | 245 |
| 5–32 | A ramped grave showing the evidence and features that are regularly preserved on the surface of the grave structure, as well as what can be left behind after a grave is robbed. | 248 |
| 5–33 | Suspending planks within or over a grave allows workers to remove fill and clean remains without disturbing them. | 249 |
| 5–34 | A deep single grave is accessed by removal of a section of one wall in Guatemala. | 250 |
| 5–35 | Removal of overlying deposits from a defined edge revealed in situ bodies at an execution site from the Srebrenica Massacre at Kozluk, Bosnia. | 253 |
| 6–1 | Fluoroscope c-arm for use in forensic work. | 287 |
| 6–2 | Direct digital x-ray unit for use in forensic work. | 290 |
| 6–3 | Desktop processor and portable darkroom in a temporary mortuary in the Former Yugoslavia. | 291 |
| 6–4 | An example of a dental processor. | 292 |
| 7–1 | The effects of freeze–thaw flux on human bone, Western Desert, Egypt. | 313 |
| 7–2 | Impact of burrowing on boundaries and contextual security as seen in a grave in Guatemala. | 316 |
| 7–3 | Experimentally produced pits and striations resulting from (a) carnivore gnawing, (b) rodent gnawing, and (c) defleshing. | 319 |
| 7–4 | Summary worldwide results derived from the canonical variate analysis of the CRANID sample. | 329 |
| 7–5 | (a) Location of the pubic tubercle on the innominate bone. (b) Schematic example of different stages of extension to the pubic tubercle. | 343 |
| 7–6 | The FDI two-digit system of designating teeth. | 347 |
| 7–7 | Stages of development of dentition from the ages of 5 months antenatal to 35 years. | 348 |
| 7–8 | Codes used for the stages of mineralisation of the permanent mandibular dentition. | 349 |
| 8–1 | (a) This case from Rwanda exhibits significantly asymmetric orbit size and shape. (b) Severe arthritic conditions, such as those exhibited on this left femur, would undoubtedly cause much discomfort and probably affect the gait of the individual. (c) This case from Rwanda exhibits changes characteristic of a cleft lip and palate. | 392 |
| 8–2 | Schematic of forces acting on long bone. | 399 |
| 8–3 | Ballistics trauma to crania. | 402 |
| 8–4 | Blunt force trauma to crania. | 403 |
| 8–5 | Sharp force trauma to crania. | 407 |
| 8–6 | Ballistics trauma to the right parietal of a male. | 410 |
| 8–7 | FDI system for labelling deciduous and permanent dentition. | 411 |
| 8–8 | Descriptive aspects of an individual tooth and palatal quadrant. | 413 |
| 8–9 | Anterior view of the dentition of an adult male exhibiting enamel erosion of anterior dentition reflecting the use of a tartaric-based tooth cleansing substance. | 417 |
| 8–10 | Quadrant of the suggested background for dental photography. | 418 |
| 8–11 | Directional terms, planes, and sections for recording the human skeleton. | 431 |
| 8–12 | Anterior aspect of the cranium showing cranial landmarks for use in craniometric analysis. | 436 |
| 8–13 | Lateral aspect of the cranium showing cranial landmarks for use in craniometric analysis. | 437 |
| 8–14 | Basilar view of the cranium showing cranial landmarks for use in craniometric analysis. | 437 |
| 8–15 | Cranial measurements in the sagittal plane showing cranial landmarks for use in craniometric analysis. | 438 |
| 8–16 | A guide to measurements of the left clavicle, superior aspect. | 446 |
| 8–17 | A guide to measurements of the left scapula. | 446 |
| 8–18 | A guide to measurements of the sternum. | 446 |
| 8–19 | A guide to measurements of the left humerus. | 448 |
| 8–20 | A guide to measurements of the proximal left humerus. | 448 |
| 8–21 | A guide to measurements of the left radius, anterior view. | 448 |
| 8–22 | A guide to measurements of the left ulna. | 449 |
| 8–23 | A guide to measurement of the metacarpal. | 449 |
| 8–24 | A guide to measurement of the vertebra. | 450 |
| 8–25 | A guide to measurements of the sacrum. | 451 |
| 8–26 | A guide to measurements of the pelvis. | 451 |
| 8–27 | A guide to measurements of the left femur. | 455 |
| 8–28 | A guide to measurements of the epiphyses left femur. | 455 |
| 8–29 | A guide to measurements of the left tibia. | 456 |
| 8–30 | A guide to measurements of the proximal left tibia. | 456 |
| 8–31 | A guide to measurements of the fibula. | 456 |
| 8–32 | A guide to measurements of the calcaneus. | 458 |
| 8–33 | A guide to measurements of the talus. | 458 |
| 8–34 | A guide to measurement of the fifth metatarsal. | 458 |
| 8–35 | Flow chart to determine which forms should be used when recording human skeletal remains. | 461 |
| Life cycle of a typical blowfly – summary of where and how to collect each stage. | 464 | |
| 9–2 | Searching soil samples from a grave site for insect specimens. | 467 |
| 9–3 | Larval mass of Lucilia/Calliphora blowfly species in the shoulder region of a human corpse. | 467 |
| 9–4 | Egg masses of the bluebottle blowfly, Calliphora vicina, laid along the edge of the mouth of a pig, a typical body orifice site. | 468 |
| 9–5 | Larvae of the greenbottle blowfly, Lucilia species, recovered in loose soil from a depth of about 3 to 5 cm at a distance of 1.4 m from a human corpse. | 470 |
| 9–6 | Summary of sampling techniques for fly larvae and puparia. | 471 |
| 9–7 | Newly emerged adults of a bluebottle blowfly, Calliphora vicina, with their empty puparia. | 473 |
| 9–8 | Sampling contexts for pollen and mineralogy used in mass graves of northeast Bosnia. | 480 |
| 9–9 | Example of recording forensic odontological examination on an Interpol recording form. | 495 |
| 10–1 | Relationship between the scientific process and AMD collection. | 500 |
| 10–2 | Permanent shortening and deformity of the left humerus of an adult male where a midshaft fracture has not been effectively treated. | 506 |
| 2–1 | Field equipment | page 102 |
| 2–2 | Mortuary equipment | 103 |
| 3–1 | Overview of waste disposal | 133 |
| 3–2 | Recommended colour coding for containers for clinical waste | 133 |
| 3–3 | Types of disinfectants and their application | 138 |
| 3–4 | Recommended containers for waste | 141 |
| 3–5 | Safe operations list | 143 |
| 4–1 | Reasons for body search in the field and in the mortuary | 155 |
| 4–2 | Items to be packaged into plastic evidence bags | 162 |
| 4–3 | Items to be packaged into rigid or other type containers | 163 |
| 4–4 | Items to be packaged into paper evidence bags | 163 |
| 4–5 | Scene of crime examiner’s mortuary forms | 166 |
| 4–6 | Evidence handover guide | 169 |
| 5–1 | Data entry codes for articulated bodies | 224 |
| 5–2 | Additional data entry codes for bodies and body parts | 226 |
| 5–3 | Example entry codes for data collectors such as the SDR33 | 227 |
| 5–4 | Data entry codes for artefacts | 227 |
| 5–5 | Field recording forms | 259 |
| 6–1 | Standard skeletal and dental radiograph series | 289 |
| 6–2 | Radiology, pathology, and general mortuary recording forms | 293 |
| 7–1 | Bone weathering stages | 312 |
| 7–2 | The main characteristic features to score when recording striations | 320 |
| 7–3 | The main characteristic features to score when recording pits | 320 |
| 7–4 | Criteria for identifying actor and effector | 322 |
| 7–5 | Craniofacial traits for the visual assessment of ancestry | 324 |
| 7–6 | Nonmetric traits | 325 |
| 7–7 | Nonmetric variation of teeth | 326 |
| 7–8 | Craniofacial traits for metric assessment of ancestry needed for computation | 327 |
| 7–9 | Postcranial traits for metric assessment of ancestry needed for computation | 328 |
| 7–10 | Cranial and facial indices used for assessing ancestry | 330 |
| 7–11 | Morphological analysis of the pelvic girdle | 333 |
| 7–12 | Morphological analysis of the cranium and mandible | 334 |
| 7–13 | Categories of biological sex | 335 |
| 7–14 | Discriminant functions (in millimetres) for metrical sex determination of the skull for blacks and whites | 335 |
| 7–15 | Sex determination using the vertical diameter of the humeral head | 337 |
| 7–16 | Sex discriminants of the humerus for whites (measurements in millimetres) | 337 |
| 7–17 | Sex determination using the maximum diameter of the femoral head for American whites | 337 |
| 7–18 | Sex discriminants of the femur for whites (measurements in millimetres) | 337 |
| 7–19 | Regression coefficients for the tibia | 337 |
| 7–20 | Craniometric measurements for metrical assessment | 338 |
| 7–21 | Postcranial measurements for metric assessment | 339 |
| 7–22 | Final sex attribution | 341 |
| 7–23 | The two-digit system of designating deciduous teeth – the FDI system (1971) | 347 |
| 7–24 | Developmental stages of teeth from 5 months antenatal to 35 years | 348 |
| 7–25 | Age estimation (in years) for nonadults using tooth mineralisation | 350 |
| 7–26 | Age estimation (in months) from deciduous tooth eruption | 351 |
| 7–27 | Age estimation (in years) from permanent tooth eruption | 351 |
| 7–28 | Age estimation for nonadults through the appearance of primary and secondary cranial ossification centres | 352 |
| 7–29 | Age estimation for nonadults through the appearance of primary and secondary postcranial ossification centres | 353 |
| 7–30 | Age estimation for nonadults from the fusion of cranial ossification centres | 357 |
| 7–31 | Age estimation for nonadults from the fusion of postcranial ossification centres | 358 |
| 7–32 | Nonadult skeletal elements used for the metrical analysis for the estimation of age | 360 |
| 7–33 | Dimensions (in millimetres) of pars basilaris in individuals of documented age | 360 |
| 7–34 | Dimensions (in millimetres) of the antenatal sphenoid bone | 361 |
| 7–35 | Dimensions (in millimetres) of the pars petrosa and the tympanic ring | 361 |
| 7–36 | Dimensions (in millimetres) of the antenatal zygomatic bone | 362 |
| 7–37 | Dimensions (in millimetres) of the antenatal maxilla | 362 |
| 7–38 | Dimensions (in millimetres) of antenatal mandible | 363 |
| 7–39 | Maximum clavicular length (in millimetres) for antenatal measurements | 363 |
| 7–40 | Maximum clavicular length (in millimetres) for nonadult measurements | 364 |
| 7–41 | Dimensions (in centimetres) of the antenatal scapula | 364 |
| 7–42 | Dimensions (in centimetres) of the nonadult scapula | 365 |
| 7–43 | Dimensions (in millimetres) of the antenatal ilium, ischium, and the pubis | 365 |
| 7–44 | Humeral diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years | 366 |
| 7–45 | Radial diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years | 367 |
| 7–46 | Ulna diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years | 368 |
| 7–47 | Femoral diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years | 369 |
| 7–48 | Tibiae diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years | 370 |
| 7–49 | Fibula diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years | 371 |
| 7–50 | Humeral total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years | 371 |
| 7–51 | Radial total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years | 372 |
| 7–52 | Ulna total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years | 372 |
| 7–53 | Femoral total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years | 373 |
| 7–54 | Tibiae total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years | 373 |
| 7–55 | Fibula total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years | 374 |
| 7–56 | Regression equations of age on maximum humeral length (in millimetres) from 24 antenatal weeks to 6 weeks postnatal | 374 |
| 7–57 | Regression equations of age on maximum radial length (in millimetres) from 24 antenatal weeks to 6 weeks postnatal | 374 |
| 7–58 | Regression equations of age on maximum ulna length (in millimetres) from 24 antenatal weeks to 6 weeks postnatal | 374 |
| 7–59 | Regression equations of age on maximum femoral length (in millimetres) from 24 antenatal weeks to 6 weeks postnatal | 375 |
| 7–60 | Regression equations of age on tibiae length (in millimetres) from 24 antenatal weeks to 6 weeks postnatal | 375 |
| 7–61 | Length (in millimetres) of the antenatal fibular diaphysis | 375 |
| 7–62 | Ageing characteristics of the vertebral body | 375 |
| 7–63 | Scoring system for male and female pubic symphysis | 376 |
| 7–64 | Characteristics of the adult rib end morphology as an age indicator | 377 |
| 7–65 | Description of characteristics used to derive a composite score for the auricular surface | 378 |
| 7–66 | Description of the locations of the auricular surface | 379 |
| 7–67 | Definitions for characteristics used to derive a composite score for the auricular surface | 379 |
| 7–68 | Scoring system for the auricular surface | 380 |
| 7–69 | Age estimates from composite scores and age stages | 380 |
| 8–1 | Soft tissue correction factors for the Fully method | 386 |
| 8–2 | Regression equations and standard error (in centimetres) to estimate stature from long bones in individuals between 18 and 30 years | 387 |
| 8–3 | Stature estimation in recent forensic cases (L = length) | 387 |
| 8–4 | Equations for stature estimation (in millimetres) from metacarpal bones | 388 |
| 8–5 | Simple linear regression of stature calculated from metatarsal measurements (in millimetres) | 389 |
| 8–6 | Multiple regression equations for stature calculated from metatarsal measurements (in millimetres) | 390 |
| 8–7 | Stature correction (in millimetres) for males and females of age 46 to 85 years | 390 |
| 8–8 | Terminology for describing pathological lesions on bone | 395 |
| 8–9 | Classifications for describing pathological lesions on bone | 397 |
| 8–10 | Terminology for describing antemortem trauma on bone | 398 |
| 8–11 | Classifications for describing antemortem trauma on bone | 398 |
| 8–12 | Direct and indirect fractures | 398 |
| 8–13 | Complete and incomplete bone fractures | 401 |
| 8–14 | Coding for dental analysis by anthropologists | 412 |
| 8–15 | Measurement of nonadult sphenoid bone | 432 |
| 8–16 | Measurement of the nonadult temporal, pars basilaris, and zygomatic bones | 432 |
| 8–17 | Measurement of the nonadult maxilla and mandible | 433 |
| 8–18 | Measurement of the nonadult clavicle, scapula, humerus, radius, and ulna | 433 |
| 8–19 | Measurement of the nonadult ilium, ischium, and pubis | 434 |
| 8–20 | Measurement of the nonadult femur, tibia, and fibula | 434 |
| 8–21 | Cranial measurements | 435 |
| 8–22 | Definitions for adult cranial measurements used in CRANID and FORDISC | 438 |
| 8–23 | Standard postcranial measurements | 442 |
| 8–24 | Measurement of the adult clavicle, scapula, and sternum | 445 |
| 8–25 | Measurement of the adult humerus, radius, and ulna | 447 |
| 8–26 | Measurement of the adult vertebra | 449 |
| 8–27 | Measurement of the adult pelvis | 450 |
| 8–28 | Measurement of the adult femur, tibia, and fibula | 452 |
| 8–29 | Measurement of the adult tarsals and metatarsals | 457 |
| 8–30 | Anthropology and odontology recording forms | 462 |
| 9–1 | Sample sizes and storage for plant, soil, pollen, spore, and diatom analysis methods | 477 |
| 9–2 | Typical and forensic inputs of palynomorphs to a site | 480 |
| 9–3 | Equipment for forensic odontology | 493 |
While aspects of the process and procedure described in this book originated with the experience of some of the authors and editors while working with ICTY’s forensic teams in the Balkans, and elsewhere, the idea and impetus for this book developed from the Inforce Foundation’s Protocols (Version 4) (Inforce, 2004a) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) (Inforce, 2004b). This book is adapted and much expanded from those documents. The Inforce protocols and SOPs were developed to guide the forensic investigation of mass graves and the analysis of human remains and other evidence from mass graves. These documents were a product of the expertise and contributions freely given by many people from around the world, many of whom are or have been Inforce Scientific Advisors. They have been vitally important in our collective endeavour to improve the manner and effectiveness of the use of the forensic sciences in the investigation of atrocity crimes and mass fatality incidents.
The guidance presented in this book is adapted and expanded from these contributions, which have been drawn together, heavily contextualised, added to, and edited into a cohesive format by the editorial team under the leadership of Professor Margaret Cox. This book is the cumulative effort of many individuals to whom we are extremely grateful. The list begins with the many attendees who took the time to comment on the initial and relatively short draft protocol documents circulated at the 2002 Inforce Conference and Workshop, and on the more detailed versions that were circulated later. The early contribution of these experts is acknowledged. While they are too numerous to name individually, we would particularly like to thank Jon Sterenberg (ICMP, Bosnia). We are particularly grateful to the following contributors to the Inforce Protocols. Michael Hedley and Dr Andrew Tyrell (JPAC, US) acted as key contributors and coordinators to their areas of specific expertise in preparing the protocols. Each contributed much expertise and time. Andy Tyrell is also thanked for commenting extensively on earlier versions of Chapters 7 and 8 of this book. Also deserving a special mention are Alison Anderson, Paul Cheetham, Tim Loveless, Romina Manning, Steve Naidoo, David Oxlee, Alison Perman, Amanda Reddick, Professor Guy Rutty, Mark Viner, and Professor Richard Wright. We are grateful to Dr Thomas Holland for his permission to base part of the anthropology protocol and SOPs on the CILHI Laboratory SOP of circa 2002/2003.
The development of the Inforce SOPs has involved considerably more work than the protocols because this is a significantly more comprehensive document. We are particularly grateful to the following individuals, who have contributed to the development of the SOPs and so to this book: Alison Anderson, Professor Caroline Barker, Tony Brown, Paul Cheetham, Dr Derek Clark, Sarah Donnelly, Dr Martin Hall, Major Tim Haynie, Michael Hedley, Dr Peter Jones, Dr Mary Lewis, Dr Louise Loe, Romina Manning, Jackie McKinley, David Oxlee, Alison Perman, Margaret Samuels, David Schofield, Dr Hendrik Scholtz, Dr Andrew Tyrell, Dr Jeanine Vellema, Mark Viner, and Professor Richard Wright. Tim Loveless is thanked for both his editorial pen and his photographic expertise.
That all of the individuals and organisations mentioned here have contributed to the development of the Inforce Protocols and SOPs should not be taken to infer that they necessarily endorse all aspects of those documents or this book. Ultimate responsibility for the content of this book lies with its authors and editors.
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Bournemouth University in funding some of the development of the Inforce Foundation Protocols and SOPs, and of Bournemouth University and the Inforce Foundation for financial support while preparing this book.
All royalties resulting from the sale of this publication will go to the Inforce Foundation (registered UK charity no. 1097435).
| Alison Anderson | National Health Service, Greater Glascow and Clyde, Scotland/Association of Anatomical Pathology Technologists, UK |
| Caroline Barker | International Independent Group of Eminent Persons, Colombo, Sri Lanka |
| Professor Tony Brown | School of Geography, Southampton University, UK |
| Paul Cheetham | School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK |
| Dr Derek Clark | Freelance Consultant |
| Professor Margaret Cox | Inforce Foundation, UK |
| Sarah Donnelly | Freelance Consultant |
| Ambika Flavel | Inforce Foundation, UK |
| Dr Martin Hall | Department of Entemology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK |
| Ian Hanson | School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK |
| Major Tim Haynie | Freelance Consultant |
| Michael Hedley | Gloucestershire Constabulary, UK (retired) |
| Dr Peter Jones | Freelance Consultant |
| Joanna Laver | Dorset Police, UK |
| Dr Mary Lewis | Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, UK |
| Dr Louise Loe | Oxford Archaeology, Oxford, UK |
| Tim Loveless | Freelance Consultant |
| Romina Manning | United Nations |
| Jacqueline McKinley | Wessex Archaeology, Salisbury, UK |
| David Oxlee | Kalagate Imagery Bureau, St Neots, Cambridge, UK |
| Alison Perman | City of London Police, UK |
| Margaret Samuels | Department of Psychiatry, Duke University, Durham, NC, US |
| David Schofield | School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK |
| Dr Hendrik Scholtz | International SOS Pte Ltd., Singapore |
| Dr Jeanine Vellema | Division of Forensic Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand/Gauteng, Department of Health, Forensic Pathology Services, Johannesberg, South Africa |
| Mark Viner | Inforce Foundation, UK/Bartholomew and the Royal London Hospitals, UK |
| Roland Wessling | Inforce Foundation, UK |
| Professor Richard Wright | Emeritus Professor, University of Sidney, Australia |