Cambridge University Press
978-0-521-86587-6 - The Scientific Investigation of Mass Graves: Towards Protocols and Standard Operating Procedures - by Margaret Cox, Ambika Flavel, Ian Hanson, Joanna Laver and Roland Wessling
Frontmatter/Prelims



The Scientific Investigation of Mass
Graves: Towards Protocols and
Standard Operating Procedures



This book describes the detailed processes and techniques essential for the scientific investigation of atrocity crimes. It includes methods for the location, evaluation, excavation, recovery, and recording of mass graves and the analysis of human remains and other evidence in order to establish the identity of victims and the cause and manner of their deaths. This volume establishes protocols and standard operating procedures to guide standards and approaches that can be used in both judicial and humanitarian contexts. The procedures for field and mortuary application are flexible and can be used to meet specific project aims, constraints, and contexts.

   The phases of activity and detailed methodological approaches set out in this book describe components of a complex scientific process. Chapters examine the evaluation of possible sites, scene of crime management, health and safety, key roles, excavation of graves, forensic sciences, mortuary management, analysis of human remains, and antemortem data collection. Recommended recording forms are included on the accompanying CD.

Professor Margaret Cox is visiting professor at the University of Southampton and chief executive of the Inforce Foundation. Her forensic work has taken her to France, Belgium, Kosovo, Rwanda, Iraq, and Cyprus, and she regularly undertakes domestic casework in the United Kingdom. She is the author of numerous peer-reviewed publications and several books, including Forensic Archaeology: Advances in Theory and Practice (coauthored with Professor John Hunter) and Health and Disease in Britain: Prehistory to the Present (coauthored with Professor Charlotte Roberts).

Ambika Flavel is a forensic osteoarchaeologist with the Inforce Foundation. She has worked for many different international organisations and been involved in numerous international mass grave investigations in such places as the Former Yugoslavia, Guatemala, and Iraq. She has also contributed to training and capacity building programmes and in teaching field and laboratory techniques to university students, professionals, and law enforcement agencies.

Ian Hanson is a lecturer in forensic archaeology at Bournemouth University, UK. His experience in working on mass grave investigations and exhumations has taken him to Bosnia, Croatia, Guatemala, the DR Congo, the United Kingdom, the United States, Cyprus, Egypt, and the Sudan. He has worked as a professional archaeologist in Europe, Africa, the United States, and the Middle East and has served as a consultant to various agencies such as the ICTY, UN, FAFG, Kenyon International, and the police.

Joanna Laver is a crime scene investigator for Dorset Police, UK. She has worked as a professional archaeologist in the UK, South America, and Cyprus. Her experience as a forensic osteoarchaeologist has taken her to such places as Kosovo, Cyprus, and Iraq, and she has contributed to domestic cases in the UK. She has been involved in training and capacity building programmes, teaching field and laboratory techniques to students and professionals.

Roland Wessling is forensic science and operations manager for the Inforce Foundation. He has worked as a consultant for numerous organisations on atrocity crime investigations and exhumations in the Balkans, Cyprus, and Iraq and on domestic cases in Germany and Britain. He regularly contributes to capacity building and training programmes for students and professionals.





The Scientific
Investigation of Mass
Graves: Towards
Protocols and
Standard Operating
Procedures



Margaret Cox
Inforce Foundation

Ambika Flavel
Inforce Foundation

Ian Hanson
Bournemouth University

Joanna Laver
Dorset Police Service

Roland Wessling
Inforce Foundation





CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi

Cambridge University Press
32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10013–2473, USA

www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521865876

© Alison Anderson, Caroline Barker, Tony Brown, Paul Cheetham, Derek Clark, Margaret Cox, Sarah Donnelly,
Ambika Flavel, Martin Hall, Ian Hanson, Tim Haynie, Michael Hedley, Peter Jones, Joanna Laver, Mary Lewis,
Louise Loe, Tim Loveless, Romina Manning, Jacqueline McKinley, David Oxlee, Alison Perman, Margaret
Samuels, David Schofield, Hendrik Scholtz, Jeanine Vellema, Mark Viner, Roland Wessling, Richard Wright, and
the Inforce Foundation 2008

This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without
the written permission of Cambridge University Press.

First published 2008

Printed in the United States of America

A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library.

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

The scientific investigation of mass graves : towards protocols and standard operating procedures /
Margaret Cox …[et al.].
   p. ; cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-521-86587-6 hardback
1. Forensic sciences – Standards. 2. Autopsy – Standards. 3. Criminal investigation.
4. Crime scene searches. 5. Mass burials. 6. War crimes.
I. Cox, Margaret, 1950–
[DNLM: 1. Forensic Anthropology – standards. 2. Autopsy – standards. 3. Exhumation – standards.
4. Homicide. 5. War Crimes. W 750S4165 2008]
RA1053.S33  2008
614′.1 – dc22      2007013561

ISBN 978-0-521-86587-6 hardback

Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for
the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or
third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication
and does not guarantee that any content on such
Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.





This book is dedicated to all those who have pioneered the
application and development of the forensic sciences and crime
scene processes to mass grave investigations since the 1940s.





Contents



List of Figures page xvii
List of Tables xxii
Acknowledgments xxvii
List of Contributors xxix
1   Introduction and context • MARGARET COX, AMBIKA FLAVEL , AND IAN HANSON 1
  1.1  Rationale 1
  1.2  Scope, background planning, and flexibility 3
  1.3  Structure of this book 6
  1.4  Historical context 7
  1.5  Semantics 9
  1.6  Political and legal context 12
  1.7  Forensic science and the investigation of mass murder, disposal, and concealment 15
  1.8  Mass murder and disposal scenes 19
  1.9  The ethical context 21
          1.9.1  Overriding code of conduct 24
          1.9.2  Contractual and operational involvement 24
          1.9.3  Treatment of human remains in investigations, analysis, and research 25
          1.9.4  Acting as an expert witness 25
          1.9.5  Education and public liaison 26
  1.10  Concluding remarks 26
  1.11  Inforce Foundation recording forms 26
          1.11.1  Introduction 26
          1.11.2  Selecting the correct form 27
          1.11.3  The recording forms 28
I   Protocols for the location, excavation, and analysis of remains from mass graves and other deposition sites
2   Protocols for the investigation of mass graves • ALISON ANDERSON, MARGARET COX, AMBIKA FLAVEL, IAN HANSON, MICHAEL HEDLEY, JOANNA LAVER, ALISON PERMAN, MARK VINER, AND RICHARD WRIGHT 39
  2.1  Standards and personnel 39
  2.2  Phase 1 – Site assessment and evaluation 41
          2.2.1  Planning 43
          2.2.2  Area or site preparation 46
          2.2.3  Area location 47
          2.2.4  Site location 48
          2.2.5  Site confirmation 50
          2.2.6  Evidence processing 52
          2.2.7  Documentation and recording 53
          2.2.8  Assessment completion 53
          2.2.9  Site integrity 55
          2.2.10  Information dissemination 55
          2.2.11  Evidence handover 56
          2.2.12  Summary: Phase 1 – Site assessment and evaluation 56
  2.3  Phase 2 – Site excavation and evidence recovery 57
          2.3.1  Planning 59
          2.3.2  Evidence processing 62
          2.3.3  Documentation and recording 63
          2.3.4  Site preparation 63
          2.3.5  Site investigation I: Surface evidence 65
          2.3.6  Site investigation Ⅱ: Site formation and grave exposure 67
          2.3.7  Site investigation Ⅲ: Excavation 68
          2.3.8  Completion of excavation 71
          2.3.9  Site closure 72
          2.3.10  Off-site analysis 73
          2.3.11  Final reports 73
          2.3.12  Information dissemination 73
          2.3.13  Evidence handover – Check 74
          2.3.14  Summary: Phase 2 – Site excavation and evidence recovery 74
  2.4  Phase 3 – The mortuary 76
          2.4.1  Planning 77
          2.4.2  Site preparation and commissioning 81
          2.4.3  Evidence management, integrity, and custody 83
          2.4.4  Postmortem examination 87
          2.4.5  Completion of the postmortem examination 96
          2.4.6  Final reports 97
          2.4.7  Case completion and closure of the mortuary 97
          2.4.8  Information dissemination 98
          2.4.9  Evidence handover 98
          2.4.10  Summary: Phase 3 – Mortuary process 99
  2.5  Appendix: Equipment lists 102
II   Standard operating procedures
3   Health and safety • ALISON ANDERSON, IAN HANSON, DAVID SCHOFIELD, HENDRIK SCHOLTZ, JEANINE VELLEMA, AND MARK VINER 109
  3.1  Introduction 109
          3.1.1  Statement of intent 110
  3.2  General policy 110
  3.3  Legal requirements 115
  3.4  Health and safety in the field 115
  3.5  Health and safety in the mortuary 120
          3.5.1  Radiological safety in the mortuary 123
          3.5.2  Supervision of safety procedures 124
          3.5.3  Personal protective equipment 126
          3.5.4  Health and safety during postmortem examinations 128
          3.5.5  Disposal of waste 132
          3.5.6  Mortuary specification 134
          3.5.7  Other personnel 135
          3.5.8  Health and safety and the arrival of remains at the mortuary 136
          3.5.9  Decontamination and disinfectants and disinfection of the mortuary 137
          3.5.10  Clinical waste management 139
          3.5.11  Observation of postmortem examinations 142
  3.6  Documentation and recording: Risk assessment forms and logs 143
  3.7  Appendix: Health and safety legislation 143
4   Scene of crime examination • SARAH DONNELLY, MICHAEL HEDLEY, TIM LOVELESS, ROMINA MANNING, ALISON PERMAN, AND ROLAND WESSLING 148
  4.1  Introduction 148
          4.1.1  Scene of crime manager 149
          4.1.2  Scene of crime examiner 150
  4.2  Field procedures 150
          4.2.1  Site integrity and continuity 150
          4.2.2  Evidence integrity and continuity 151
  4.3  Mortuary procedures 159
          4.3.1  Mortuary integrity and continuity 159
          4.3.2  Evidence integrity and continuity 159
  4.4  Forensic photography 168
          4.4.1  Photographic processes 170
          4.4.2  Digital image capture and handling 174
  Protection of digital photographs 175
  4.5  Data storage and security 175
          4.5.1  Hardware and software 176
          4.5.2  Electronic data handling 177
          4.5.3  Postmortem database 179
          4.5.4  Laptop user policy and guide 181
5   Search, location, excavation, and recovery • PAUL CHEETHAM, MARGARET COX, AMBIKA FLAVEL , IAN HANSON, TIM HAYNIE, DAVID OXLEE, AND ROLAND WESSLING 183
  5.1  Introduction 183
          5.1.1  Personnel and standards 185
  5.2  Approaches and phases 189
          5.2.1  Resources 190
          5.2.2  Climate and environment 190
  5.3  Area and site location 190
          5.3.1  Remote sensing and imagery 196
          5.3.2  Geophysical survey 203
          5.3.3  Other methods 206
          5.3.4  Key points 211
  5.4  Site confirmation 211
          5.4.1  Surface scatters 211
          5.4.2  Site assessment 212
  5.5  Forensic archaeological excavation 216
          5.5.1  Forensic sites and archaeology 218
          5.5.2  Survey 219
          5.5.3  Grave preparation and protection 229
          5.5.4  Excavation 234
          5.5.5  Recovering forensic evidence 243
          5.5.6  Excavation techniques 246
          5.5.7  Other forensic contexts for mass disposal of human remains 252
  5.6  Excavation of human remains 254
          5.6.1  Excavation of human remains procedures 255
          5.6.2  Documentation and recording responsibilities 258
          5.6.3  Recovery of human remains 259
          5.6.4  Excavation of human remains: Summary 263
  5.7  Sampling and sieving 264
  5.8  Site preservation and restoration 265
  5.9  Documentation and recording: Field forms and logs 266
6   Mortuary procedures I – Pathology, radiography, and the role of the anatomical pathology technologist • ALISON ANDERSON, HENDRIK SCHOLTZ, JEANINE VELLEMA, AND MARK VINER 268
  6.1  Introduction 268
  6.2  Property and exhibits 270
  6.3  Role and duties of the forensic pathologist 271
          6.3.1  Medicolegal postmortem examination 271
          6.3.2  Features contributing to the identification of the deceased 273
          6.3.3  Establishing the cause and manner of death 275
          6.3.4  Guidelines on issuing death certificates 277
          6.3.5  Specimen collection and sampling 278
          6.3.6  Body and specimen/sample storage 282
  6.4  Role and responsibilities of the anatomical pathology technologist 283
          6.4.1  Medicolegal duties 283
          6.4.2  Reconstruction of the body 284
          6.4.3  Viewing for identification purposes 284
          6.4.4  Skeletonised remains 285
  6.5  Role and responsibilities of the forensic radiographer 286
          6.5.1  Personnel 286
          6.5.2  Examination procedure 286
          6.5.3  Equipment and storage 289
          6.5.4  Recording 291
  6.6  Documentation and recording: Mortuary forms and logs 292
7   Mortuary procedures Ⅱ – Skeletal analysis I: Basic procedures and demographic assessment • CAROLINE BARKER, MARGARET COX, AMBIKA FLAVEL , JOANNA LAVER, AND LOUISE LOE 295
  7.1  Introduction 295
  7.2  Basic procedures 297
          7.2.1  Defleshing, cleaning, and handling human skeletal remains 297
          7.2.2  Distinguishing human from nonhuman skeletal and dental remains 301
          7.2.3  Reconstruction of human skeletal remains 304
          7.2.4  Determination of the minimum number of individuals and the examination of commingled skeletal remains and body parts 305
          7.2.5  Application of population-specific methods 308
  7.3  Assessment of taphonomic change 311
          7.3.1  Types of taphonomic change 312
          7.3.2  Water and taphonomic change 316
          7.3.3  Assessing and recording bone surface changes 318
  7.4  Estimation of ancestry 322
          7.4.1  Visual assessment of ancestry 323
          7.4.2  Osteometric assessment of ancestry 327
  7.5  Assessment of biological sex 328
          7.5.1  Morphological methods for estimating biologial sex 332
          7.5.2  Metrical analysis for estimating biologial sex 335
          7.5.3  Disorders of sexual differentiation 336
  7.6  Assessment of parturition 342
          7.6.1  Methodology and recording 344
  7.7  Estimation of age at death 344
          7.7.1  Ageing nonadults 345
          7.7.2  Ageing adults 367
          7.7.3  Recording 382
8   Mortuary procedures Ⅲ – Skeletal analysis 2: Techniques for determining identity • CAROLINE BARKER, MARGARET COX, AMBIKA FLAVEL, JOANNA LAVER, MARY LEWIS, AND JACQUELINE MCKINLEY 383
  8.1  Introduction 383
  8.2  Estimation of stature 384
          8.2.1  Stature estimation from the complete skeleton 385
          8.2.2  Stature estimation from complete long bones 386
          8.2.3  Relative stature 390
  8.3  Assessment of skeletal pathology and trauma 391
          8.3.1  Skeletal pathology 396
          8.3.2  Skeletal trauma 397
  8.4  Examination of dentition 410
  8.5  Assessment of heat-modified remains 418
          8.5.1  Analytical techniques 420
          8.5.2  Assessment of demography, pathology, and trauma in burnt bone 424
  8.6  Assessment of handedness 425
  8.7  Sampling tissue for analysis by external laboratories 426
  8.8  Metrical analysis 430
          8.8.1  Measurement of nonadult skeletons 432
          8.8.2  Measurement of adult skeletons 434
  8.9  Documentation and quality control 459
          8.9.1  Recording and documentation 459
          8.9.2  Quality control 459
          8.9.3  Recording forms 461
9   Forensic sciences • MARTIN HALL , TONY BROWN, PETER JONES, AND DEREK CLARK 463
  9.1  Forensic entomology 463
          9.1.1  Introduction 463
          9.1.2  Equipment for insect collecting 465
          9.1.3  Collection of insect samples 468
          9.1.4  Killing and preservation of insect specimens 471
          9.1.5  Maintenance of living larvae 473
          9.1.6  Recording 474
          9.1.7  Summary points 474
  9.2  Environmental sampling 475
          9.2.1  Introduction 475
          9.2.2  Soil and sediment 475
          9.2.3  Sampling 477
          9.2.4  Analytical methodology: Macroscopic 478
          9.2.5  Analytical methodology: Palynomorphs 478
          9.2.6  Analytical methodology: Mineralogy and geochemistry 481
          9.2.7  Conclusions 482
  9.3  DNA analysis 482
          9.3.1  Introduction 482
          9.3.2  Rationale 483
          9.3.3  DNA quality and quantity 485
          9.3.4  Sampling from bodies 485
          9.3.5  Field preservation of samples 486
          9.3.6  Sample verification 487
          9.3.7  Contamination issues 487
          9.3.8  Recording, packing, labelling, and transporting 489
  9.4  Forensic odontology 490
          9.4.1  Introduction 490
          9.4.2  Personnel 490
          9.4.3  Procedure for dental identification 491
          9.4.4  Age assessment in neonates and infants 492
          9.4.5  Forensic odontological examination and recording 492
          9.4.6  Collection of antemortem records 496
10   Antemortem data collection: Interaction with families and communities • MARGARET SAMUELS 498
  10.1  Introduction 498
  10.2  Antemortem data collection 499
          10.2.1  Engaging informants 501
          10.2.2  Data collection tool 502
          10.2.3  Engaging appropriate staff 502
          10.2.4  Elements of an antemortem data tool 503
          10.2.5  Informant rights and terminating the interview 507
  10.3  Viewing human remains and clothing 507
  10.4  Traumatic events and reactions 508
  10.5  What can the forensic team and helping professional do? 511
  10.6  The professionals’ own reactions 513
Bibliography 517
Index 543




List of Figures



2–1 Flow chart of the site assessment process. page 42
2–2 Flow chart of personnel associated with the site assessment process. 45
2–3 Flow chart of the excavation and evidence recovery process. 58
2–4 Flow chart of personnel associated with site excavation and evidence recovery process. 61
2–5 A multiple mass grave site in the Former Yugoslavia where imported material was dumped in piles across a grave site presumably to disguise the graves. 66
2–6 Careful excavation around the edges of grave sites can reveal important evidence such as tyre tracks associated with transporting bodies to graves. 69
2–7 Flow chart of the mortuary process. 77
2–8 Flow chart of personnel associated with the mortuary process. 79
2–9 Example of a mortuary layout demonstrating clean and dirty areas. 81
3–1 Evidence recovered during the investigation of a mass grave site in the Former Yugoslavia strongly suggested that the area had previously been used as a chemical weapons testing site. 118
4–1 Tarpaulins are effective and useful temporary protective covers for mass graves. 152
4–2 The day and date recorded from Seiko automatic watches served as strong evidence in dating events in the Srebrenica Massacre. 154
4–3 The unscientific excavation of mass graves will always fail to recover all evidence. 157
4–4 Blindfolds can trap hair in the knot. 172
5–1 In the Former Yugoslavia some victims’ remains were buried in local cemeteries. 185
5–2 Sand quarry north of Najaf, Iraq. 186
5–3 The local community at Nyamata, Rwanda, recovered human remains from a backfilled latrine to a depth of 9 m. 187
5–4 In Ntarama, Rwanda, this massacre site has become a focus for genocide tourism. 193
5–5 Photogaphs have been taken of the dead, mass graves, and excavations since cameras were developed. 194
5–6 Aerial imagery taken by NATO for military reconnaissance purposes over Srebrenica in July 1995. 197
5–7 Imagery released in August 1995 showing machines excavating graves at Branjevo Farm, dating the Srebrenica Massacre. 199
5–8 Inforce personnel using GPR in Iraq to search for anomalies that pinpointed potential grave sites in an area located by local witnesses. 204
5–9 Forensic landscape – features in the landscape often have significance to perpetrators. 207
5–10 Vegetation growth over an area of soil disturbance following the creation of a mass grave. 209
5–11 Plants growing in a quarry used as an execution site in Bosnia were crushed beneath victims. 210
5–12 Trenching to locate graves. 213
5–13 Surface stripping can provide a clear outline of the grave structure without intrusive trenching. 215
5–14 The survival of materials in this grave demonstrates the variability of preservation that can occur. 219
5–15 Baseline perpendicular measurements are a rapid way of plotting points. 220
5–16 Triangulation from a baseline is a more accurate method for rapidly plotting points. 221
5–17 Grid measurement allows accurate and systematic recording of an area, but is difficult to apply when heavy machinery is in the area. 222
5–18 The surveyor’s level provides a remote station for reading heights to augment baseline 2-D survey, and can be used to measure distance and angles. 223
5–19 Using a total station allows remote, rapid 3-D surveying. 224
5–20 Survey of anatomical landmarks allows simple ‘stick figure’ representation for 3-D survey manipulation. 225
5–21 Munitions such as cluster bomblets will regularly fail to explode on impact and are dispersed in areas that are marked as free from munitions on military plans. 229
5–22 Perpetrators do not normally check for services before digging a grave. 231
5–23 A deep grave showing the ground works and engineering that may be required to safely excavate a mass grave. 232
5–24 Small 360 excavators are useful for operating in and around a grave; backhoes are useful for moving spoil and site preparation. 234
5–25 The ICTY excavation at the ‘Dam’ site near Petkovci. 235
5–26 An undisturbed grave with no space between bodies to allow the team to work within the grave structure may require the removal of one or more grave walls. 238
5–27 A partially filled or robbed grave with space between bodies and groups of bodies allows effective excavation without removing walls or damaging remains. 239
5–28 Stratigraphic excavation maximises evidence recovery and stratigraphic understanding. 241
5–29 In forensic cases, when the grave outline has been identified, the backfilled soil is removed in arbitrary spits. 242
5–30 A deep grave showing the evidence and features that are regularly preserved on the surface of the grave structure. 244
5–31 Recovery of machine tool marks can provide data on the make and type of machine, as well as individuating the machine used itself. 245
5–32 A ramped grave showing the evidence and features that are regularly preserved on the surface of the grave structure, as well as what can be left behind after a grave is robbed. 248
5–33 Suspending planks within or over a grave allows workers to remove fill and clean remains without disturbing them. 249
5–34 A deep single grave is accessed by removal of a section of one wall in Guatemala. 250
5–35 Removal of overlying deposits from a defined edge revealed in situ bodies at an execution site from the Srebrenica Massacre at Kozluk, Bosnia. 253
6–1 Fluoroscope c-arm for use in forensic work. 287
6–2 Direct digital x-ray unit for use in forensic work. 290
6–3 Desktop processor and portable darkroom in a temporary mortuary in the Former Yugoslavia. 291
6–4 An example of a dental processor. 292
7–1 The effects of freeze–thaw flux on human bone, Western Desert, Egypt. 313
7–2 Impact of burrowing on boundaries and contextual security as seen in a grave in Guatemala. 316
7–3 Experimentally produced pits and striations resulting from (a) carnivore gnawing, (b) rodent gnawing, and (c) defleshing. 319
7–4 Summary worldwide results derived from the canonical variate analysis of the CRANID sample. 329
7–5 (a) Location of the pubic tubercle on the innominate bone. (b) Schematic example of different stages of extension to the pubic tubercle. 343
7–6 The FDI two-digit system of designating teeth. 347
7–7 Stages of development of dentition from the ages of 5 months antenatal to 35 years. 348
7–8 Codes used for the stages of mineralisation of the permanent mandibular dentition. 349
8–1 (a) This case from Rwanda exhibits significantly asymmetric orbit size and shape. (b) Severe arthritic conditions, such as those exhibited on this left femur, would undoubtedly cause much discomfort and probably affect the gait of the individual. (c) This case from Rwanda exhibits changes characteristic of a cleft lip and palate. 392
8–2 Schematic of forces acting on long bone. 399
8–3 Ballistics trauma to crania. 402
8–4 Blunt force trauma to crania. 403
8–5 Sharp force trauma to crania. 407
8–6 Ballistics trauma to the right parietal of a male. 410
8–7 FDI system for labelling deciduous and permanent dentition. 411
8–8 Descriptive aspects of an individual tooth and palatal quadrant. 413
8–9 Anterior view of the dentition of an adult male exhibiting enamel erosion of anterior dentition reflecting the use of a tartaric-based tooth cleansing substance. 417
8–10 Quadrant of the suggested background for dental photography. 418
8–11 Directional terms, planes, and sections for recording the human skeleton. 431
8–12 Anterior aspect of the cranium showing cranial landmarks for use in craniometric analysis. 436
8–13 Lateral aspect of the cranium showing cranial landmarks for use in craniometric analysis. 437
8–14 Basilar view of the cranium showing cranial landmarks for use in craniometric analysis. 437
8–15 Cranial measurements in the sagittal plane showing cranial landmarks for use in craniometric analysis. 438
8–16 A guide to measurements of the left clavicle, superior aspect. 446
8–17 A guide to measurements of the left scapula. 446
8–18 A guide to measurements of the sternum. 446
8–19 A guide to measurements of the left humerus. 448
8–20 A guide to measurements of the proximal left humerus. 448
8–21 A guide to measurements of the left radius, anterior view. 448
8–22 A guide to measurements of the left ulna. 449
8–23 A guide to measurement of the metacarpal. 449
8–24 A guide to measurement of the vertebra. 450
8–25 A guide to measurements of the sacrum. 451
8–26 A guide to measurements of the pelvis. 451
8–27 A guide to measurements of the left femur. 455
8–28 A guide to measurements of the epiphyses left femur. 455
8–29 A guide to measurements of the left tibia. 456
8–30 A guide to measurements of the proximal left tibia. 456
8–31 A guide to measurements of the fibula. 456
8–32 A guide to measurements of the calcaneus. 458
8–33 A guide to measurements of the talus. 458
8–34 A guide to measurement of the fifth metatarsal. 458
8–35 Flow chart to determine which forms should be used when recording human skeletal remains. 461
Life cycle of a typical blowfly – summary of where and how to collect each stage. 464
9–2 Searching soil samples from a grave site for insect specimens. 467
9–3 Larval mass of Lucilia/Calliphora blowfly species in the shoulder region of a human corpse. 467
9–4 Egg masses of the bluebottle blowfly, Calliphora vicina, laid along the edge of the mouth of a pig, a typical body orifice site. 468
9–5 Larvae of the greenbottle blowfly, Lucilia species, recovered in loose soil from a depth of about 3 to 5 cm at a distance of 1.4 m from a human corpse. 470
9–6 Summary of sampling techniques for fly larvae and puparia. 471
9–7 Newly emerged adults of a bluebottle blowfly, Calliphora vicina, with their empty puparia. 473
9–8 Sampling contexts for pollen and mineralogy used in mass graves of northeast Bosnia. 480
9–9 Example of recording forensic odontological examination on an Interpol recording form. 495
10–1 Relationship between the scientific process and AMD collection. 500
10–2 Permanent shortening and deformity of the left humerus of an adult male where a midshaft fracture has not been effectively treated. 506




List of Tables



2–1 Field equipment page 102
2–2 Mortuary equipment 103
3–1 Overview of waste disposal 133
3–2 Recommended colour coding for containers for clinical waste 133
3–3 Types of disinfectants and their application 138
3–4 Recommended containers for waste 141
3–5 Safe operations list 143
4–1 Reasons for body search in the field and in the mortuary 155
4–2 Items to be packaged into plastic evidence bags 162
4–3 Items to be packaged into rigid or other type containers 163
4–4 Items to be packaged into paper evidence bags 163
4–5 Scene of crime examiner’s mortuary forms 166
4–6 Evidence handover guide 169
5–1 Data entry codes for articulated bodies 224
5–2 Additional data entry codes for bodies and body parts 226
5–3 Example entry codes for data collectors such as the SDR33 227
5–4 Data entry codes for artefacts 227
5–5 Field recording forms 259
6–1 Standard skeletal and dental radiograph series 289
6–2 Radiology, pathology, and general mortuary recording forms 293
7–1 Bone weathering stages 312
7–2 The main characteristic features to score when recording striations 320
7–3 The main characteristic features to score when recording pits 320
7–4 Criteria for identifying actor and effector 322
7–5 Craniofacial traits for the visual assessment of ancestry 324
7–6 Nonmetric traits 325
7–7 Nonmetric variation of teeth 326
7–8 Craniofacial traits for metric assessment of ancestry needed for computation 327
7–9 Postcranial traits for metric assessment of ancestry needed for computation 328
7–10 Cranial and facial indices used for assessing ancestry 330
7–11 Morphological analysis of the pelvic girdle 333
7–12 Morphological analysis of the cranium and mandible 334
7–13 Categories of biological sex 335
7–14 Discriminant functions (in millimetres) for metrical sex determination of the skull for blacks and whites 335
7–15 Sex determination using the vertical diameter of the humeral head 337
7–16 Sex discriminants of the humerus for whites (measurements in millimetres) 337
7–17 Sex determination using the maximum diameter of the femoral head for American whites 337
7–18 Sex discriminants of the femur for whites (measurements in millimetres) 337
7–19 Regression coefficients for the tibia 337
7–20 Craniometric measurements for metrical assessment 338
7–21 Postcranial measurements for metric assessment 339
7–22 Final sex attribution 341
7–23 The two-digit system of designating deciduous teeth – the FDI system (1971) 347
7–24 Developmental stages of teeth from 5 months antenatal to 35 years 348
7–25 Age estimation (in years) for nonadults using tooth mineralisation 350
7–26 Age estimation (in months) from deciduous tooth eruption 351
7–27 Age estimation (in years) from permanent tooth eruption 351
7–28 Age estimation for nonadults through the appearance of primary and secondary cranial ossification centres 352
7–29 Age estimation for nonadults through the appearance of primary and secondary postcranial ossification centres 353
7–30 Age estimation for nonadults from the fusion of cranial ossification centres 357
7–31 Age estimation for nonadults from the fusion of postcranial ossification centres 358
7–32 Nonadult skeletal elements used for the metrical analysis for the estimation of age 360
7–33 Dimensions (in millimetres) of pars basilaris in individuals of documented age 360
7–34 Dimensions (in millimetres) of the antenatal sphenoid bone 361
7–35 Dimensions (in millimetres) of the pars petrosa and the tympanic ring 361
7–36 Dimensions (in millimetres) of the antenatal zygomatic bone 362
7–37 Dimensions (in millimetres) of the antenatal maxilla 362
7–38 Dimensions (in millimetres) of antenatal mandible 363
7–39 Maximum clavicular length (in millimetres) for antenatal measurements 363
7–40 Maximum clavicular length (in millimetres) for nonadult measurements 364
7–41 Dimensions (in centimetres) of the antenatal scapula 364
7–42 Dimensions (in centimetres) of the nonadult scapula 365
7–43 Dimensions (in millimetres) of the antenatal ilium, ischium, and the pubis 365
7–44 Humeral diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years 366
7–45 Radial diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years 367
7–46 Ulna diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years 368
7–47 Femoral diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years 369
7–48 Tibiae diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years 370
7–49 Fibula diaphyseal length (in millimetres) of nonadults from 1.5 months to 12 years 371
7–50 Humeral total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years 371
7–51 Radial total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years 372
7–52 Ulna total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years 372
7–53 Femoral total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years 373
7–54 Tibiae total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years 373
7–55 Fibula total length including epiphyses (in millimetres) of nonadults from 10 to 18 years 374
7–56 Regression equations of age on maximum humeral length (in millimetres) from 24 antenatal weeks to 6 weeks postnatal 374
7–57 Regression equations of age on maximum radial length (in millimetres) from 24 antenatal weeks to 6 weeks postnatal 374
7–58 Regression equations of age on maximum ulna length (in millimetres) from 24 antenatal weeks to 6 weeks postnatal 374
7–59 Regression equations of age on maximum femoral length (in millimetres) from 24 antenatal weeks to 6 weeks postnatal 375
7–60 Regression equations of age on tibiae length (in millimetres) from 24 antenatal weeks to 6 weeks postnatal 375
7–61 Length (in millimetres) of the antenatal fibular diaphysis 375
7–62 Ageing characteristics of the vertebral body 375
7–63 Scoring system for male and female pubic symphysis 376
7–64 Characteristics of the adult rib end morphology as an age indicator 377
7–65 Description of characteristics used to derive a composite score for the auricular surface 378
7–66 Description of the locations of the auricular surface 379
7–67 Definitions for characteristics used to derive a composite score for the auricular surface 379
7–68 Scoring system for the auricular surface 380
7–69 Age estimates from composite scores and age stages 380
8–1 Soft tissue correction factors for the Fully method 386
8–2 Regression equations and standard error (in centimetres) to estimate stature from long bones in individuals between 18 and 30 years 387
8–3 Stature estimation in recent forensic cases (L = length) 387
8–4 Equations for stature estimation (in millimetres) from metacarpal bones 388
8–5 Simple linear regression of stature calculated from metatarsal measurements (in millimetres) 389
8–6 Multiple regression equations for stature calculated from metatarsal measurements (in millimetres) 390
8–7 Stature correction (in millimetres) for males and females of age 46 to 85 years 390
8–8 Terminology for describing pathological lesions on bone 395
8–9 Classifications for describing pathological lesions on bone 397
8–10 Terminology for describing antemortem trauma on bone 398
8–11 Classifications for describing antemortem trauma on bone 398
8–12 Direct and indirect fractures 398
8–13 Complete and incomplete bone fractures 401
8–14 Coding for dental analysis by anthropologists 412
8–15 Measurement of nonadult sphenoid bone 432
8–16 Measurement of the nonadult temporal, pars basilaris, and zygomatic bones 432
8–17 Measurement of the nonadult maxilla and mandible 433
8–18 Measurement of the nonadult clavicle, scapula, humerus, radius, and ulna 433
8–19 Measurement of the nonadult ilium, ischium, and pubis 434
8–20 Measurement of the nonadult femur, tibia, and fibula 434
8–21 Cranial measurements 435
8–22 Definitions for adult cranial measurements used in CRANID and FORDISC 438
8–23 Standard postcranial measurements 442
8–24 Measurement of the adult clavicle, scapula, and sternum 445
8–25 Measurement of the adult humerus, radius, and ulna 447
8–26 Measurement of the adult vertebra 449
8–27 Measurement of the adult pelvis 450
8–28 Measurement of the adult femur, tibia, and fibula 452
8–29 Measurement of the adult tarsals and metatarsals 457
8–30 Anthropology and odontology recording forms 462
9–1 Sample sizes and storage for plant, soil, pollen, spore, and diatom analysis methods 477
9–2 Typical and forensic inputs of palynomorphs to a site 480
9–3 Equipment for forensic odontology 493




Acknowledgments



While aspects of the process and procedure described in this book originated with the experience of some of the authors and editors while working with ICTY’s forensic teams in the Balkans, and elsewhere, the idea and impetus for this book developed from the Inforce Foundation’s Protocols (Version 4) (Inforce, 2004a) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) (Inforce, 2004b). This book is adapted and much expanded from those documents. The Inforce protocols and SOPs were developed to guide the forensic investigation of mass graves and the analysis of human remains and other evidence from mass graves. These documents were a product of the expertise and contributions freely given by many people from around the world, many of whom are or have been Inforce Scientific Advisors. They have been vitally important in our collective endeavour to improve the manner and effectiveness of the use of the forensic sciences in the investigation of atrocity crimes and mass fatality incidents.

   The guidance presented in this book is adapted and expanded from these contributions, which have been drawn together, heavily contextualised, added to, and edited into a cohesive format by the editorial team under the leadership of Professor Margaret Cox. This book is the cumulative effort of many individuals to whom we are extremely grateful. The list begins with the many attendees who took the time to comment on the initial and relatively short draft protocol documents circulated at the 2002 Inforce Conference and Workshop, and on the more detailed versions that were circulated later. The early contribution of these experts is acknowledged. While they are too numerous to name individually, we would particularly like to thank Jon Sterenberg (ICMP, Bosnia). We are particularly grateful to the following contributors to the Inforce Protocols. Michael Hedley and Dr Andrew Tyrell (JPAC, US) acted as key contributors and coordinators to their areas of specific expertise in preparing the protocols. Each contributed much expertise and time. Andy Tyrell is also thanked for commenting extensively on earlier versions of Chapters 7 and 8 of this book. Also deserving a special mention are Alison Anderson, Paul Cheetham, Tim Loveless, Romina Manning, Steve Naidoo, David Oxlee, Alison Perman, Amanda Reddick, Professor Guy Rutty, Mark Viner, and Professor Richard Wright. We are grateful to Dr Thomas Holland for his permission to base part of the anthropology protocol and SOPs on the CILHI Laboratory SOP of circa 2002/2003.

   The development of the Inforce SOPs has involved considerably more work than the protocols because this is a significantly more comprehensive document. We are particularly grateful to the following individuals, who have contributed to the development of the SOPs and so to this book: Alison Anderson, Professor Caroline Barker, Tony Brown, Paul Cheetham, Dr Derek Clark, Sarah Donnelly, Dr Martin Hall, Major Tim Haynie, Michael Hedley, Dr Peter Jones, Dr Mary Lewis, Dr Louise Loe, Romina Manning, Jackie McKinley, David Oxlee, Alison Perman, Margaret Samuels, David Schofield, Dr Hendrik Scholtz, Dr Andrew Tyrell, Dr Jeanine Vellema, Mark Viner, and Professor Richard Wright. Tim Loveless is thanked for both his editorial pen and his photographic expertise.

   That all of the individuals and organisations mentioned here have contributed to the development of the Inforce Protocols and SOPs should not be taken to infer that they necessarily endorse all aspects of those documents or this book. Ultimate responsibility for the content of this book lies with its authors and editors.

   We gratefully acknowledge the support of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Bournemouth University in funding some of the development of the Inforce Foundation Protocols and SOPs, and of Bournemouth University and the Inforce Foundation for financial support while preparing this book.

   All royalties resulting from the sale of this publication will go to the Inforce Foundation (registered UK charity no. 1097435).





List of Contributors



Alison Anderson National Health Service, Greater Glascow and Clyde, Scotland/Association of Anatomical Pathology Technologists, UK
Caroline Barker International Independent Group of Eminent Persons, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Professor Tony Brown School of Geography, Southampton University, UK
Paul Cheetham School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK
Dr Derek Clark Freelance Consultant
Professor Margaret Cox Inforce Foundation, UK
Sarah Donnelly Freelance Consultant
Ambika Flavel Inforce Foundation, UK
Dr Martin Hall Department of Entemology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
Ian Hanson School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK
Major Tim Haynie Freelance Consultant
Michael Hedley Gloucestershire Constabulary, UK (retired)
Dr Peter Jones Freelance Consultant
Joanna Laver Dorset Police, UK
Dr Mary Lewis Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, UK
Dr Louise Loe Oxford Archaeology, Oxford, UK
Tim Loveless Freelance Consultant
Romina Manning United Nations
Jacqueline McKinley Wessex Archaeology, Salisbury, UK
David Oxlee Kalagate Imagery Bureau, St Neots, Cambridge, UK
Alison Perman City of London Police, UK
Margaret Samuels Department of Psychiatry, Duke University, Durham, NC, US
David Schofield School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, UK
Dr Hendrik Scholtz International SOS Pte Ltd., Singapore
Dr Jeanine Vellema Division of Forensic Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand/Gauteng, Department of Health, Forensic Pathology Services, Johannesberg, South Africa
Mark Viner Inforce Foundation, UK/Bartholomew and the Royal London Hospitals, UK
Roland Wessling Inforce Foundation, UK
Professor Richard Wright Emeritus Professor, University of Sidney, Australia




© Cambridge University Press