International crimes, such as crimes against humanity, genocide and war crimes, are committed by individuals. However, individuals rarely commit such crimes for their own profit. Instead, such crimes are often caused by collective entities. Notable examples include the ‘dirty war’ in Argentina in the 1970s and 1980s, the atrocities committed during the Balkan Wars in the early 1990s and the crimes committed during the ongoing armed conflicts in the Darfur area in Sudan. Referring to Darfur, the Prosecutor of the ICC noted in 2008 that although he had indicted a few individuals, ‘the information gathered points to an ongoing pattern of crimes committed with the mobilization of the whole state apparatus’.
This book reviews the main legal avenues that are available within the international legal order to address the increasingly important problem of system criminality and identifies possible improvements.
Harmen van der Wilt is Professor of International Criminal Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam.
André Nollkaemper is Professor of Public International Law and Director of the Amsterdam Center for International Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam.
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi
Cambridge University Press
The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK
Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521763561
© Cambridge University Press 2009
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2009
Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data
System criminality in international law / Harmen van der Wilt (editor), André Nollkaemper p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-521-76356-1 (hardback) 1. Criminal jurisdiction. 2. International offenses. I. Wilt, Harmen van der, 1955– II. Kleffner, Jann K. III. Title. K5036.S97 2009 345’.0235–dc22 2009010961
ISBN 978-0-521-76356-1 hardback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
Preface
|
vii |
Table of cases
|
ix |
Table of treaties and international instruments
|
xvii |
List of abbreviations
|
xxviii |
List of contributors
|
xxxi |
1 Introduction
André Nollkaemper
|
1 |
2 The policy context of international crimes
Herbert C. Kelman
|
26 |
3 Why corporations kill and get away with it: the failure of law to cope with crime in organizations
Maurice Punch
|
42 |
4 Men and abstract entities: individual responsibility and collective guilt in international criminal law
Gerry Simpson
|
69 |
5 A historical perspective: from collective to individual responsibility and back
Andrea Gattini
|
101 |
6 Command responsibility and Organisationsherrschaft: ways of attributing international crimes to the ‘most responsible’
Kai Ambos
|
127 |
7 Joint criminal enterprise and functional perpetration
Harmen van der Wilt
|
158 |
8 System criminality at the ICTY
Elies van Sliedregt
|
183 |
9 Criminality of organizations under international law
Nina H. B. Jørgensen
|
201 |
10 Criminality of organizations: lessons from domestic law – a comparative perspective
Albin Eser in cooperation with Felix Rettenmaier
|
222 |
11 The collective accountability of organized armed groups for system crimes
Jann K. Kleffner
|
238 |
12 Assumptions and presuppositions: state responsibility for system crimes
Iain Scobbie
|
270 |
13 State responsibility for international crimes
A. Zimmermann and M. Teichmann
|
298 |
14 Responses of political organs to crimes by states
Nigel D. White
|
314 |
15 Conclusions and outlook
André Nollkaemper and Harmen van der Wilt
|
338 |
Index
|
355 |
This book explores the state of international law in respect of situations of system criminality, that is: situations where collective entities such as states or organised armed groups order or encourage international crimes to be committed, or permit or tolerate the committing of international crimes. The book emanated from a widely felt discomfort with the mismatch between the dominant role of collective entities in situations where international crimes are committed, on the one hand, and the current fashionable focus on individual (criminal) responsibility, exemplified by the mushroom of international criminal tribunals, on the other.
Against the background of a discussion of the mechanisms through which collective entities induce or cause international crimes to be committed, the book focuses in particular on the power and limitations of forms of international responsibilities in regard to system criminality, covering individual responsibility, responsibility of organizations and organized armed groups, and state responsibility.
While separate aspects of the role of collective entities in regard to international crimes have been subject to scholarly analysis, we felt that there was a lack of comprehensive assessments of the state of the law, the lacunas in the law of international responsibility and the prospects for strengthening the law. This book aims to fill part of the gap and contribute to an understanding of this increasingly important area of law.
The chapters in this book were originally presented at a conference held at the Amsterdam Center for International Law, University of Amsterdam, on 20 and 21 October 2006. They were reworked on the basis of the discussions at the conference and in light of later developments. The conference was made possible by contributions from the Universiteit van Amsterdam, the Amsterdam Center for International Law, the Department of Criminal Law of the Universiteit van Amsterdam and the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW).
We would like to thank Stefanie Küfner and Caitilin McGivern for their excellent editorial assistance in the preparation of the book.
André Nollkaemper
Harmen van der Wilt (editors)
Menno Dolman
Jann Kleffner (assistant editors)
1 July 2009
Yassin Abdullah Kadi v Council and Commission, Case T-315/01 (2005) 310
Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands v Greece (1969) 75
Ireland v the United Kingdom (1978) 75
Selmouni v France (1999) 48
Goiburù y otros v Paraguay (2006) 126
Montero-Aranguren y otros v Venezuela (Retén de Catia) (2005) 126
Myrna Mack Chang v Guatemala (2003) 276, 295
Velasquez Rodriguez v Honduras (1988) 304, 306
Prosecutor v Ahmad Muhammad Harun and Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman (ICC-02/05–01/07) (2007) 2
Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Decision Concerning PTCI’s Decision of 10 February 2006 and the Incorporation of Documents into the Record of the Case against Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (ICC-01/04–01/06) Pre-Trial Chamber (2006) 128, 129, 141–43
Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on the Confirmation of Charges (ICC-01/04–01/06–803) Pre-Trial Chamber (2007) 128, 141–43
Prosecutor v Akayesu (ICTR-96–4), Trial Chamber, Judgment (1998) 130, 243
Prosecutor v Alfred Musema (ICTR-96–13), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2000) 207
Prosecutor v André Rwamakuba (ICTR-98–44-AR72.4), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2006) 163
Prosecutor v Bagilishema (ICTR-95–1A), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2002) 130, 138
Prosecutor v Édouard Karemera et al., Decision on Jurisdictional Appeals: Joint Criminal Enterprise (ICTR-98–44-AR72.5 and ICTR-98–44-AR72.6), Appeal Chamber (2006) 171, 172, 194
Prosecutor v Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza and Hassan Ngeze (ICTR-99–52-T), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2003) 207, 219
Prosecutor v Kajelijeli (ICTR-98–44A), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2003) 130
Prosecutor v Karera (ICTR-01–74), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2007) 133
Prosecutor v Kayishema and Ruzindana (ICTR-95–1), Trial Chamber, Judgment (1999) 130
Prosecutor v Rutaganda (ICTR-96–3) Trial Chamber, Judgment (1999) 130
Prosecutor v Rwamakuba, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Regarding Application of Joint Criminal Enterprise to the Crime of Genocide (ICTR-98–44G), Appeals Chamber (2004) 163, 171, 194, 209
Prosecutor v Semanza (ICTR-97–20), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2003) 130
Prosecutor v Theoneste Bagosora (ICTR-96–7–1), Indictment (1999) 201
Prosecutor v Aleksovski (IT-95–14/1), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2000) 185
Prosecutor v Aleksovski (IT-95–14/1), Trial Chamber, Judgment (1999) 129, 133
Prosecutor v Babić (IT-03–72), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2004) 139
Prosecutor v Blagojević and Jokić (IT-02–60), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2005) 122, 198
Prosecutor v Blagojović (IT-02–60), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2007) 187
Prosecutor v Blaskić (IT-95–14), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2000) 129, 133
Prosecutor v Boskoski and Tarculovski (IT-04–82-PT), Pre-Trial Chamber, Decision on Prosecution’s motion to amend the indictment (2006) 135
Prosecutor v Brđanin (IT-99–36-T), Appeals Chamber, Decision on Interlocutory Appeals (2004) 140
Prosecutor v Brđanin (IT-99–36-T), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2007) 163, 172, 192–99
Prosecutor v Brđanin (IT-99–36-T), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2004) 121, 130, 133, 162, 166, 171–73, 191–96
Prosecutor v Delalić (IT-96–21), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2002) 133, 184, 185, 187, 188
Prosecutor v Delalić et al. (IT-96–21), Trial Chamber, Judgment (1998) 129, 131, 133, 184, 185, 187, 188
Prosecutor v Hadžihasanović and Kubura (IT-01–47), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2008) 264
Prosecutor v Hadžihasanović and Kubura (IT-01–47-T), Appeals Chamber, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Challenging Jurisdiction in Relation to Command Responsibility (2003) 131, 133, 135, 185–88
Prosecutor v Hadžihasanović and Kubura (IT-01–47-T), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2006) 130, 131, 185–88
Prosecutor v Halilović (IT-01–48), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2005) 130, 186
Prosecutor v Jelisić (IT 95–10-T), Trial Chamber, Judgment (1999) 13, 124
Prosecutor v Jelisic (IT-95–10-A), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2001) 13, 71, 87–89
Prosecutor v Kordić and Čerkez (IT-95–14/2), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2004) 351
Prosecutor v Kordić and Čerkez (IT-95–14/2), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2001) 129, 130
Prosecutor v Krajišnik (IT-00–39/40), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2006) 172–75, 180, 182, 191, 208, 209
Prosecutor v Krnojelac (IT-97–25-A), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2003) 132, 162, 171, 182, 186
Prosecutor v Krstić (IT-98–33-T), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2004) 140, 193
Prosecutor v Krstić (IT-98–33-T), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2001) 4, 70, 90, 122, 136, 140, 347
Prosecutor v Kunarac/Kovac (IT-96–23 & 23/1), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2001) 105, 134
Prosecutor v Kupreskic et al. (IT-95–16), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2000) 249
Prosecutor v Kvočka (IT-98–30/1), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2001) 136, 139, 162, 164, 170, 171
Prosecutor v Kvočka et al. (IT-98–30/1), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2005) 162, 165
Prosecutor v Limaj et al. (IT-03–66), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2005) 130, 239, 244, 245, 249
Prosecutor v Milutinović, Šainović & Ojdanić (IT-99–37-AR72), Appeals Chamber, Decision on Dragoljub Ojdanić’s Motion Challenging Jurisdiction (2003) 160–62
Prosecutor v Mrksić, Radić, Sljivancanin (IT-95–13/1), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2007) 130, 133
Prosecutor v Orić (IT-03–68-A) Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2008) 185–87, 198
Prosecutor v Orić (IT-03–68-T) Trial Chamber, Judgment (2006) 130, 131, 133–38, 187
Prosecutor v Ramush Haradinaj, Idriz Balaj and Lahi Brahimaj (IT-04–84-T) Trial Chamber, Judgment (2008) 239, 243
Prosecutor v Simić, Tadić and Zarić (IT-95–9-T), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2003) 165
Prosecutor v Slobodan Milosević (IT-02–54-T), Trial Chamber, Decision on Motion for Judgment of Acquittal (2004) 3, 83, 84, 87, 92, 121, 140, 191, 198, 208, 209
Prosecutor v Slobodan Milosević, Milan Milutinović, Sainović, Dragoljub Ojdanić, Vlajiko Stojiljković (IT-99–37-PT), Second Amended Indictment (2001) 198
Prosecutor v Stakić (IT-97–24), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2003) 143, 165, 180, 216
Prosecutor v Stakić (IT-97–24-T), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2006) 143, 165, 193, 195, 216
Prosecutor v Strugar (IT-01–42), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2005) 130, 133
Prosecutor v Tadić (IT-94–1-A), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (1999) 92, 121, 136, 158, 159, 189–91, 193, 195, 196, 199, 207, 208
Prosecutor v Tadić (IT-94–1-T), Appeals Chamber, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction (1995) 111, 247
Prosecutor v Tihomir Blaskić (IT-95–14), Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2004) 138
Prosecutor v Tihomir Blaskić (IT-95–14-T), Trial Chamber, Judgment (2000) 74, 78, 85
Admissions Case, 1948 329
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia v Serbia-Montenegro), 2007 5, 7, 8, 14, 15, 24, 69–71, 87, 110, 120, 122–25, 249, 250, 283, 284, 300, 303, 304–7, 325–27, 347, 350
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Rwanda) (2006) 270, 294
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Uganda), 2005 279, 285, 300, 302
Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v United States of America), 2004 300
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Co Ltd (Belgium v Spain), 1970 278, 279
Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Belgium), 2002 12
LaGrand (Germany v United States of America), 2001 300
Land and Maritime Border (Cameroon v Nigeria), 2002 110
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South-Africa in Namibia (South-West Africa) Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276, 1971 307, 308, 310
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 2004 276, 278, 300, 307, 333
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States), 1986 122, 335
North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v the Netherlands), 1969 311
Island of Palmas Case (Netherlands v USA) (1932) 285
Austro-German Customs Union Advisory Opinion (1931) 285
Eastern Carelia Advisory Opinion (1923) 285
Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions Case: Preliminary Objections Judgment (1924) 286, 289, 295
Rights of Minorities in Upper Silesia (Minority Schools Case) (Germany v Poland) (1928) 293
Prosecutor v Alex Tamba Brima, Brima Bazzy Kamara and Santigie Borbor Kanu, (SCSL-04–16-T) Trial Chamber, Judgment (2007) 220, 247–49
Prosecutor v Alex Tamba Brima, Brima Bazzy Kamara and Santigie Borbor Kanu (SCSL-2004–16-A) Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2008) 220, 247–49
Prosecutor v Charles Ghankay Taylor (SCSL-2003–01–1) (2006) 208
Prosecutor v Kallon and Kamara (SCSL-2004–15-PT and SCSL-2004–16-PT) Appeals Chamber, Judgment (2004) 304
Prosecutor v Sesay, Kallon and Gbao (SCSL-04–15-PT) Amended Consolidated Indictment (2006) 220
Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Criminal y Correccional de la Capital (9 December 1985) 309-I/II Coleccion Oficial de Fallos de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nacion (‘Fallos’)(‘Argentinean Generals’) 143
Letelier/Mofitt, Juez de Instrucción Bañados (12 November 1993) Fallos del Mes, año XXXV, noviembre 1993, edición suplementaria; CSJ, 30 May and 6 June 1995 143
Magistrado Ponente Javier Zapata Ortiz, Corte Suprema de Justica, Sala Penal, casción n○ 23825 del 7 marzo de 2007 143
B v R 955/99 (2004) 276
Distomo Massacre Case (2003) 115
East German Border Killings BGHSt 40, 218 (Official collection of the Supreme Court judgments in criminal matters) 236 et seq = BGH (1994) NJW 2703 143
Prefecture of Voiotia v Federal Republic of Germany (2000) 115
State of Israel v Adolf Eichmann (1961) 97–100, 143, 152, 153, 166, 178
Ferrini v Federal Republic of Germany (2004) 115, 311
Van Anraat Case (2006) 4 JICL 242 13
Abimael Guzman Reinoso et al., sentencia del 13 de octubre de2006, expediente acumulado 560–03, Sala Penal Nacional 143
Fischer and Leist (1947) 112
Joseph Buhler (1949) 112
Joseph Kramer and others (1945) 112
Erich Heyer and others (1945) 190
R (on the application of Al Rawi and others) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Secretary of State for the Home Department (2006) 276, 288
A and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2005) 276
Jones v Ministry of Interior Al-Mamlaka Al-Arabiya AS Saudiya (the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) and others (2006) 311
Jane Doe v Islamic Salvation Front (FIS) and Anwar Haddam (2003) 256
US v Long (1999) 171
Filártiga v Peña-Irala (1980) 307
United States v Ulrich Griefelt, et al. (‘RuSHA Case’) (1947) 196
USA v Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach (‘Krupp Case’) (1947–1948) 113, 114
USA v Altstoetter et al. (‘Justice Trial’) (1947) 143, 196
USA v Friedrich Flick et al. (‘Flick Case’) (1947) 114
USA v Karl Brandt et al. (‘Medical Case’) (1946–1947) 206
USA v Krauch et al. (‘Farben Case’) (1947–1948) 114
USA v Kurt Goebell et al. (‘Borkum Island Case’), Case No 12–489, US National Archives Microfilm Publications 190
USA v Martin Gottfried Weiss et al. (1945) 112
USA v Otto Ohlendorf, et al. (‘Einsatzgruppen Case’) (1947–1948) 164
USA v the Accused Organizations (1946) 204
USA v Von Ribbentrop, Goring, Streicher, Keitel et al. (1948) 93, 94
USA v Wilhelm von Leeb, et al. (‘High Command Case’) (1947–1948) 97
USA, France, UK and USSR v Hermann Goering et al. (Trial of the Major War Criminals) (1946–1947) 3
Pinkerton v United States (1946) 161
USA v the Accused Organizations (1946) 204
USA v Von Ribbentrop, Goring, Streicher, Keitel et al. (1948) 93, 94
USA v Wilhelm von Leeb, et al. (‘High Command Case’) (1947–1948) 97
USA, France, UK and USSR v Hermann Goering et al. (Trial of the Major War Criminals) (1946–1947) 3
Pinkerton v United States (1946) 161