Cambridge University Press
0521836409 - Cezanne/Pissarro, Johns/Rauschenberg - comparative studies on intersubjectivity in modern art - by Joachim Pissarro
Frontmatter/Prelims



CÉZANNE/PISSARRO, JOHNS/RAUSCHENBERG: COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON INTERSUBJECTIVITY IN MODERN ART

This book presents a comparative study of two pairs of collaborative artists who worked closely with one another for years. The first pair, Cézanne and Pissarro, contributed to the emergence of modernism. The second pair, Johns and Rauschenberg, contributed to the demise of modernism. In each case, the two artists entered into a rich and challenging artistic exchange and reaped enormous benefits from this interaction. Joachim Pissarro's comparative study suggests that these interactive dialogues were of great significance for each artist. Taking a cue from philosophers Immanuel Kant and Johann Gottlieb Fichte, he suggests that the individual is the result of reciprocal encounters: he argues that modern subjectivity is essentially open to others (intersubjective). Paradoxically, the modernist tradition has largely presented each of these four artists in isolation. This book thus also offers a critique of modernism as a monological ideology that resisted thinking about art in plural terms.

Joachim Pissarro is a curator in the Department of Painting and Sculpture at The Museum of Modern Art, New York. He is the author of many articles and books on aspects of modern art from the late nineteenth to the late twentieth centuries, and he has contributed to several exhibition catalogues, most recently Pioneering Modern Art: Paul Cézanne and Camille Pissarro 1865–1885 at The Museum of Modern Art in New York.





Cézanne/Pissarro, Johns/Rauschenberg

COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON INTERSUBJECTIVITY IN MODERN ART

Joachim Pissarro





CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo

Cambridge University Press
40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA

www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521836401

© Joachim Pissarro 2006

This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without
the written permission of Cambridge University Press.

First published 2006

Printed in Hong Kong by Golden Cup

A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library.

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Pissarro, Joachim.
Cézanne/Pissarro, Johns/Rauschenberg : comparative studies on intersubjectivity in modern art / Joachim
Pissarro.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN-13: 978-0-521-83640-1 (hardback)
ISBN-10: 0-521-83640-9 (hardback)
1. Modernism (Art) 2. Artistic collaboration. 3. Intersubjectivity 4. Cézanne, Paul,
1839–1906 – Friends and associates. 5. Pissarro, Camille, 1830–1903 – Friends and associates.
6. Johns, Jasper, 1930–Friends and associates. 7. Rauschenberg, Robert, 1925–Friends
and associates. I. Title.
N6494.M64P57    2005
759.056 – dc22    2005012968

ISBN-13 978-0-521-83640-1 hardback
ISBN-10 0-521-83640-9 hardback

Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for
the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or
third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication
and does not guarantee that any content on such
Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.





In memory of my mother.
   To my wife and my son.





CONTENTS

List of Illustrations page xi
Acknowledgments xiii
INTRODUCTION 1
  Some Preliminary Questions 2
  Art History as a Human Science Concerned with the Study of Humankind and the Possibility of Mutual Understanding 6
  The Fallacies of Modernism and the Historicist Approach to Art History 8
  Dead History vs. Interpretive History 9
PART 1. BEGINNINGS  
Pissarro and Cézanne, Johns and Rauschenberg  
  Bookends of Modernism 14
  Meeting Each Other (and Others) 18
  From One World to Another 22
  Without a Master: The Autonomy of the Individual 24
  Freely Going beyond Painting 27
  New Definitions of What Is Beautiful 30
PART 2. MODERNISM AS A CHAIN OF CRESTS  
Nietzsche, Fry, Greenberg, Rewald  
  THE THEORY OF THE CHAIN OF CRESTS: MODERNISM AS A HISTORICISM 38
  Modernism as a System of Evaluation of Modern Art 38
  Nietzsche, Fry, Rewald, and Greenberg: The Theory of “The Chain of Crests” 39
  Truth Has Greater Value than Enthusiasm 43
  Greenberg’s Dogmatic Statements Fulfilled the Public’s Need for Truth 44
  The Two Principal Problems of Historicism 45
  The Divide between Modernism and Post-Modernism 46
  Historicist Perspective: Dogmatism and Individualism 48
  Beginning and End of Modernism 49
  Modernism and History 52
  CARVING OUT THE MODERNIST PERIOD 54
  Greenberg’s Debt to Fry 54
  Dividing Lines and Categories 54
  The Three Cézannes 55
  Monologues vs. Dialogues 57
  PISSARRO’S AND CÉZANNE’S “TENDENCY TO FLATNESS” 59
  From Manet to New York 61
  Manet’s “Frankness” and Greenberg’s Silence 62
PART 3. THE SELF IN RELATION TO THE OTHER  
  APORIAS OF MODERNISM: WHAT ALTERNATIVE IS THERE? 66
  Various Aspects of the Antinomy of Modernism: Pursuit of the Self vs. Sharing with Others 66
  From the Individual Mark to Its Erasure 68
  An Intermediary Language 69
  A Bridge between Modernity and Modernism: The Individual 74
  Why Did Greenberg Not Deal with Kant’s “Grund-Idee”: Communication? 75
  Toward a Kantian Critique of a “Kantian” Critic 78
  Ambivalent “We” 80
  THE CRITICIST TRADITION AND THE OTHER: KANT 81
  Truth and Communication 81
  The Problem of Representation Takes Root in the Subject of the Representation (Not in the Object) 82
  The Antinomy of the Judgment of Taste: Demanding General Assent vs. Individual Freedom to Be Different 84
  Judges and Judged, or Givers and Takers 86
  The Central Position of Communication 88
  THE CRITICIST TRADITION AND THE OTHER: FICHTE 89
  From the “Urge to Communicate” to the “Duties of the Aesthetical Artist” 89
  A Definition of Man Implies a Definition of Man with Others 96
  Fichte’s Paradox: Being at One with Oneself, or Outside of One’s Self 97
  CONCLUSION 100
  Differences between Kant and Fichte on the Concept of Intersubjectivity: The Role of Ethics in Aesthetics 100
  The Criticist Tradition Today: Language, Communication, Mutual Understanding (Verständigung) 104
  Application of Habermas’s Theory of Communication: Modernist Models vs. White Contradictions 107
PART 4. DIALOGUES  
Intersubjectivity at Work between Pissarro and Cézanne, and between Johns and Rauschenberg  
  Pissarro Buys Himself a Cézanne 114
  “Too Much Good Painting in His Bad Pictures” 115
  Solitude vs. Solidarity 117
  On Being or Becoming a Genius 121
  Beginnings and Transformations of the Self 123
  Pissarro’s Role in Cézanne’s Development: His Frustration with Bernard’s Account, and Annoyance at Gauguin 127
  Fry’s Interpretation of the Relationship between Pissarro and Cézanne 128
  Johns’s Dialectic: Between Reproducible Icons and Pictorial Signs 133
  Conversations with Oneself and Others 134
  Pissarro and Cézanne Become One (Almost) 137
  Rauschenberg Incorporates a Painting by Johns into His Own Work 138
  Equal Rights, Individualism, and Anarchy 140
  What These Artists Found in Each Other: A Process of Liberation 144
  The Problems of the Uniqueness, Unrepeatability, and Unerasability of a Single Creative Act 148
  Music and “Free-Form Art” 160
  Sculpting Paint: Representation or Presentation? 174
  The Duchamp Factor 181
  What Cézanne, Pissarro, Johns, and Rauschenberg Share with Each Other 184
  Four Concepts: “Gap” (Rauschenberg) vs. “Relationship” (Johns)/Impossible “Certainty” (Cézanne) and Impossible “Perfection” (Pissarro) 188
  Pissarro’s “Dream,” Rauschenberg’s “Gap,” and Kant’s “Gulf ” between the Idea and Its Realization 195
  “The Commonplace Is Everyone’s and Mine” (Sartre) 197
  Cézanne’s and Pissarro’s “Recording Devices” of the Commonplace 200
  From “Dirty Painting” to an Aesthetic of Trash 202
  Selflessness 208
  Altruism 211
  The Notion of Openness, and How It Leads to “Creating Anew” 214
PART 5. AN ART HISTORY MADE FOR AND BY ARTISTS  
  Pluralism and Dialogues vs. Modernism 218
  Historicism, Arbitrary Taste, and the “Humble Prose of Living” 219
  A Modern Artist’s Critique of Modernism 222
  Toward a Critique of the Notion of “Influence” 225
  Imagination vs. Imitation of the Past 227
  Analogies vs. Influences 231
  Dialogues Between the Art of the Present and the Art of the Past 242
  The Conflict between Subjectivity and Objectivity 249
CONCLUSION 00
  Opening Up 256
  Where Are We Today? And What Does Intersubjectivity Mean to Us? 260
Notes 263
Bibliography 299
Index 307




LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Photograph of Camille Pissarro (right) and Paul Cézanne (left), 1872 page 2
2. Photograph of Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg by Sidney B. Felsen at Gemini in October of 1980 3
3. Camille Pissarro, Pontoise, les Mathurins, 1873 14
4. Paul Cézanne, La vallée de l’Oise, c. 1881–2 15
5. Robert Rauschenberg, The Lily White, ca. 1950 21
6. Robert Rauschenberg, Minutiae, 1954 28
7. Jasper Johns, Flag, 1954–5 51
8. Jasper Johns, Tango, 1955 73
9. Jasper Johns, Skin, 1975 85
10. Jasper Johns, Souvenir, 1964 99
11. Jasper Johns, Souvenir II, 1964 101
12. Robert Rauschenberg, White Painting (Seven Panels), 1951 107
13. Group photograph with Paul Cézanne and Camille Pissarro, ca. 1875 119
14. Camille Pissarro, Louveciennes, 1871 130
15. Paul Cézanne, Louveciennes, ca. 1872 131
16. Jasper Johns, Map, 1962 135
17. Camille Pissarro, Route de Saint-Antoine à l’Hermitage, Pontoise, 1875 136
18. Paul Cézanne, Le Clos des Mathurins à Pontoise (l’Hermitage), 1875 137
19. Robert Rauschenberg, Short Circuit, 1955 139
20. Robert Rauschenberg, Self-Portrait (for New Yorker profile), 1964 149
21. Robert Rauschenberg, Factum I, 1957 152
22. Robert Rauschenberg, Factum II, 1957 153
23. Jasper Johns, Flag Above White with Collage, 1955 156
24. Jasper Johns, White Flag, 1955 157
25. Jasper Johns, Alphabets, 1957 163
26. Jasper Johns, Construction with Toy Piano, 1954 166
27. Robert Rauschenberg, Untitled (Hotel Bilbao), 1952 167
28. Marcel Duchamp, With Hidden Noise, 1916 169
29. Robert Rauschenberg, Music Box (Elemental Sculpture), 1953 173
30. Robert Rauschenberg, Paint Cans, 1954 175
31. Jasper Johns, Painted Bronze, 1960 177
32. Robert Rauschenberg, Monogram, 1955–9 179
33. Robert Rauschenberg, Automobile Tire Print, 1951 181
34. Paul Cézanne, Apples, c. 1878 186
35. Jasper Johns, Painting with Two Balls, 1960 187
36. Paul Cézanne, Portrait of Camille Pissarro, 1872–4 192
37. Camille Pissarro, Portrait of Cézanne, 1874 193
38. Camille Pissarro Bords de la Marne en hiver, 1866 205
39. Robert Rauschenberg, Dirt Painting (For John Cage), ca. 1953 207
40. Jasper Johns, Target with Plaster Casts, 1955 209
41. Jasper Johns, Light Bulb II, 1958 221
42. Robert Rauschenberg, Crocus, 1962 238
43. Robert Rauschenberg, Bed, 1955 239




Acknowledgments

This book claims that the modern era – fraught with daunting challenges as it is – is still very much alive.

   It rehearses two intuitions: the first from Kant, that one does not think (or create) as well alone as with others; the second from Fichte, that my freedom becomes explicit through the mediation of intersubjectivity, that is, that the condition of possibility of my freedom (especially here, as an artist) is that it be recognized by somebody else, and vice versa – a very timely concept today.

   These two powerful intuitions are embodied throughout the making of modern art in the last two centuries: to take a metaphor close to Jasper Johns, it always takes two to tango. This book argues that, from beginning to end, modern art has been taking form through powerful artistic interchanges – such as the two examples (Cézanne/Pissarro and Johns/Rauschenberg) studied here.

   Intersubjectivity is the subject of this book; it has also made this book possible. My vivid and warmest thanks go to Richard Shiff, as well as Michael Charlesworth, John Clarke, and Linda Henderson for accepting to read a very different and much larger version of this text as a Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Texas at Austin. I am also very grateful to Richard Brettell and Tzvetan Todorov for shaping up and critiquing the initial argument that led to this book. The theoretical argument of this book owes much to many people, namely Alain Renaut, Jean-Marc and Luc Ferry, Jean-Claude Lebensztejn, Yves Michaud, and Tzvetan Todorov, in France; Jürgen Habermas in Germany; and Michael Holquist, Thomas McCarthy, and Rudolf Makkreel, in this country. Thomas Crow, Elizabeth Easton, John Elderfield, Richard S. Field, Romy Golan, Jonathan Katz, Karen Lang, Fred Orton, Adrian Piper, Nan Rosenthal, Jennifer Russell, Richard Shiff, Claire Snollaerts, James Traub, Jayne Warman, Jonathan Weinberg, and Christopher Wood: each generously and critically contributed to various stages of this work. My warmest appreciation goes to Guy and Alec Wildenstein, of the Wildenstein Institute, and to Richard Rubin, Jack Flam, and Joan Banach, of the Dedalus Foundation, for their unwavering support throughout my research on this book.

   I have benefited from discussions with students, at Yale University and at Hunter College. I am thankful to all of them, especially Allison Harding, Hiriko Ikegami, Jeremy Melius, Karen Paik, Allison Stites, and Tonya Vernooy.

   I am deeply indebted to David White and Sarah Taggart for their invaluable help with research material related to Robert Rauschenberg’s and Jasper Johns’s works. Many thanks to the librarians of the Sterling Memorial Library, the Art and Architecture Library, and the Law Library at Yale University, and of the Avery Library and the Butler Library at Columbia University, as well as the librarians and archivists of The Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, The Museum of Modern Art, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and the Musée d’Orsay.

   It has been a real joy to work with Beatrice Rehl, at Cambridge University Press: many thanks for her dedication to this project. Judeth Oden and Tonya Vernooy have spent boundless time and energy making this manuscript ready for publication: my deep gratitude to them. Many thanks, too, to Stephen Frankel for his editorial help.

   Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg both have been generous beyond words: this book owes them much more than words can say.

   Finally, I feel a great personal and moral debt to my close family, especially to Annabel Daou, my wife, and Paul, our son: I dedicate this book to both of them.





© Cambridge University Press