CÉZANNE/PISSARRO, JOHNS/RAUSCHENBERG: COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON INTERSUBJECTIVITY IN MODERN ART
This book presents a comparative study of two pairs of collaborative artists who worked closely with one another for years. The first pair, Cézanne and Pissarro, contributed to the emergence of modernism. The second pair, Johns and Rauschenberg, contributed to the demise of modernism. In each case, the two artists entered into a rich and challenging artistic exchange and reaped enormous benefits from this interaction. Joachim Pissarro's comparative study suggests that these interactive dialogues were of great significance for each artist. Taking a cue from philosophers Immanuel Kant and Johann Gottlieb Fichte, he suggests that the individual is the result of reciprocal encounters: he argues that modern subjectivity is essentially open to others (intersubjective). Paradoxically, the modernist tradition has largely presented each of these four artists in isolation. This book thus also offers a critique of modernism as a monological ideology that resisted thinking about art in plural terms.
Joachim Pissarro is a curator in the Department of Painting and Sculpture at The Museum of Modern Art, New York. He is the author of many articles and books on aspects of modern art from the late nineteenth to the late twentieth centuries, and he has contributed to several exhibition catalogues, most recently Pioneering Modern Art: Paul Cézanne and Camille Pissarro 1865–1885 at The Museum of Modern Art in New York.
COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON INTERSUBJECTIVITY IN MODERN ART
Joachim Pissarro
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo
Cambridge University Press
40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521836401
© Joachim Pissarro 2006
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without
the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2006
Printed in Hong Kong by Golden Cup
A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library.
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Pissarro, Joachim.
Cézanne/Pissarro, Johns/Rauschenberg : comparative studies on intersubjectivity in modern art / Joachim
Pissarro.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN-13: 978-0-521-83640-1 (hardback)
ISBN-10: 0-521-83640-9 (hardback)
1. Modernism (Art) 2. Artistic collaboration. 3. Intersubjectivity 4. Cézanne, Paul,
1839–1906 – Friends and associates. 5. Pissarro, Camille, 1830–1903 – Friends and associates.
6. Johns, Jasper, 1930–Friends and associates. 7. Rauschenberg, Robert, 1925–Friends
and associates. I. Title.
N6494.M64P57 2005
759.05′6 – dc22 2005012968
ISBN-13 978-0-521-83640-1 hardback
ISBN-10 0-521-83640-9 hardback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for
the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or
third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication
and does not guarantee that any content on such
Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
In memory of my mother.
To my wife and my son.
List of Illustrations | page xi | |
Acknowledgments | xiii | |
INTRODUCTION | 1 | |
Some Preliminary Questions | 2 | |
Art History as a Human Science Concerned with the Study of Humankind and the Possibility of Mutual Understanding | 6 | |
The Fallacies of Modernism and the Historicist Approach to Art History | 8 | |
Dead History vs. Interpretive History | 9 | |
PART 1. BEGINNINGS | ||
Pissarro and Cézanne, Johns and Rauschenberg | ||
Bookends of Modernism | 14 | |
Meeting Each Other (and Others) | 18 | |
From One World to Another | 22 | |
Without a Master: The Autonomy of the Individual | 24 | |
Freely Going beyond Painting | 27 | |
New Definitions of What Is Beautiful | 30 | |
PART 2. MODERNISM AS A CHAIN OF CRESTS | ||
Nietzsche, Fry, Greenberg, Rewald | ||
THE THEORY OF THE CHAIN OF CRESTS: MODERNISM AS A HISTORICISM | 38 | |
Modernism as a System of Evaluation of Modern Art | 38 | |
Nietzsche, Fry, Rewald, and Greenberg: The Theory of “The Chain of Crests” | 39 | |
Truth Has Greater Value than Enthusiasm | 43 | |
Greenberg’s Dogmatic Statements Fulfilled the Public’s Need for Truth | 44 | |
The Two Principal Problems of Historicism | 45 | |
The Divide between Modernism and Post-Modernism | 46 | |
Historicist Perspective: Dogmatism and Individualism | 48 | |
Beginning and End of Modernism | 49 | |
Modernism and History | 52 | |
CARVING OUT THE MODERNIST PERIOD | 54 | |
Greenberg’s Debt to Fry | 54 | |
Dividing Lines and Categories | 54 | |
The Three Cézannes | 55 | |
Monologues vs. Dialogues | 57 | |
PISSARRO’S AND CÉZANNE’S “TENDENCY TO FLATNESS” | 59 | |
From Manet to New York | 61 | |
Manet’s “Frankness” and Greenberg’s Silence | 62 | |
PART 3. THE SELF IN RELATION TO THE OTHER | ||
APORIAS OF MODERNISM: WHAT ALTERNATIVE IS THERE? | 66 | |
Various Aspects of the Antinomy of Modernism: Pursuit of the Self vs. Sharing with Others | 66 | |
From the Individual Mark to Its Erasure | 68 | |
An Intermediary Language | 69 | |
A Bridge between Modernity and Modernism: The Individual | 74 | |
Why Did Greenberg Not Deal with Kant’s “Grund-Idee”: Communication? | 75 | |
Toward a Kantian Critique of a “Kantian” Critic | 78 | |
Ambivalent “We” | 80 | |
THE CRITICIST TRADITION AND THE OTHER: KANT | 81 | |
Truth and Communication | 81 | |
The Problem of Representation Takes Root in the Subject of the Representation (Not in the Object) | 82 | |
The Antinomy of the Judgment of Taste: Demanding General Assent vs. Individual Freedom to Be Different | 84 | |
Judges and Judged, or Givers and Takers | 86 | |
The Central Position of Communication | 88 | |
THE CRITICIST TRADITION AND THE OTHER: FICHTE | 89 | |
From the “Urge to Communicate” to the “Duties of the Aesthetical Artist” | 89 | |
A Definition of Man Implies a Definition of Man with Others | 96 | |
Fichte’s Paradox: Being at One with Oneself, or Outside of One’s Self | 97 | |
CONCLUSION | 100 | |
Differences between Kant and Fichte on the Concept of Intersubjectivity: The Role of Ethics in Aesthetics | 100 | |
The Criticist Tradition Today: Language, Communication, Mutual Understanding (Verständigung) | 104 | |
Application of Habermas’s Theory of Communication: Modernist Models vs. White Contradictions | 107 | |
PART 4. DIALOGUES | ||
Intersubjectivity at Work between Pissarro and Cézanne, and between Johns and Rauschenberg | ||
Pissarro Buys Himself a Cézanne | 114 | |
“Too Much Good Painting in His Bad Pictures” | 115 | |
Solitude vs. Solidarity | 117 | |
On Being or Becoming a Genius | 121 | |
Beginnings and Transformations of the Self | 123 | |
Pissarro’s Role in Cézanne’s Development: His Frustration with Bernard’s Account, and Annoyance at Gauguin | 127 | |
Fry’s Interpretation of the Relationship between Pissarro and Cézanne | 128 | |
Johns’s Dialectic: Between Reproducible Icons and Pictorial Signs | 133 | |
Conversations with Oneself and Others | 134 | |
Pissarro and Cézanne Become One (Almost) | 137 | |
Rauschenberg Incorporates a Painting by Johns into His Own Work | 138 | |
Equal Rights, Individualism, and Anarchy | 140 | |
What These Artists Found in Each Other: A Process of Liberation | 144 | |
The Problems of the Uniqueness, Unrepeatability, and Unerasability of a Single Creative Act | 148 | |
Music and “Free-Form Art” | 160 | |
Sculpting Paint: Representation or Presentation? | 174 | |
The Duchamp Factor | 181 | |
What Cézanne, Pissarro, Johns, and Rauschenberg Share with Each Other | 184 | |
Four Concepts: “Gap” (Rauschenberg) vs. “Relationship” (Johns)/Impossible “Certainty” (Cézanne) and Impossible “Perfection” (Pissarro) | 188 | |
Pissarro’s “Dream,” Rauschenberg’s “Gap,” and Kant’s “Gulf ” between the Idea and Its Realization | 195 | |
“The Commonplace Is Everyone’s and Mine” (Sartre) | 197 | |
Cézanne’s and Pissarro’s “Recording Devices” of the Commonplace | 200 | |
From “Dirty Painting” to an Aesthetic of Trash | 202 | |
Selflessness | 208 | |
Altruism | 211 | |
The Notion of Openness, and How It Leads to “Creating Anew” | 214 | |
PART 5. AN ART HISTORY MADE FOR AND BY ARTISTS | ||
Pluralism and Dialogues vs. Modernism | 218 | |
Historicism, Arbitrary Taste, and the “Humble Prose of Living” | 219 | |
A Modern Artist’s Critique of Modernism | 222 | |
Toward a Critique of the Notion of “Influence” | 225 | |
Imagination vs. Imitation of the Past | 227 | |
Analogies vs. Influences | 231 | |
Dialogues Between the Art of the Present and the Art of the Past | 242 | |
The Conflict between Subjectivity and Objectivity | 249 | |
CONCLUSION | 00 | |
Opening Up | 256 | |
Where Are We Today? And What Does Intersubjectivity Mean to Us? | 260 | |
Notes | 263 | |
Bibliography | 299 | |
Index | 307 |
1. | Photograph of Camille Pissarro (right) and Paul Cézanne (left), 1872 | page 2 |
2. | Photograph of Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg by Sidney B. Felsen at Gemini in October of 1980 | 3 |
3. | Camille Pissarro, Pontoise, les Mathurins, 1873 | 14 |
4. | Paul Cézanne, La vallée de l’Oise, c. 1881–2 | 15 |
5. | Robert Rauschenberg, The Lily White, ca. 1950 | 21 |
6. | Robert Rauschenberg, Minutiae, 1954 | 28 |
7. | Jasper Johns, Flag, 1954–5 | 51 |
8. | Jasper Johns, Tango, 1955 | 73 |
9. | Jasper Johns, Skin, 1975 | 85 |
10. | Jasper Johns, Souvenir, 1964 | 99 |
11. | Jasper Johns, Souvenir II, 1964 | 101 |
12. | Robert Rauschenberg, White Painting (Seven Panels), 1951 | 107 |
13. | Group photograph with Paul Cézanne and Camille Pissarro, ca. 1875 | 119 |
14. | Camille Pissarro, Louveciennes, 1871 | 130 |
15. | Paul Cézanne, Louveciennes, ca. 1872 | 131 |
16. | Jasper Johns, Map, 1962 | 135 |
17. | Camille Pissarro, Route de Saint-Antoine à l’Hermitage, Pontoise, 1875 | 136 |
18. | Paul Cézanne, Le Clos des Mathurins à Pontoise (l’Hermitage), 1875 | 137 |
19. | Robert Rauschenberg, Short Circuit, 1955 | 139 |
20. | Robert Rauschenberg, Self-Portrait (for New Yorker profile), 1964 | 149 |
21. | Robert Rauschenberg, Factum I, 1957 | 152 |
22. | Robert Rauschenberg, Factum II, 1957 | 153 |
23. | Jasper Johns, Flag Above White with Collage, 1955 | 156 |
24. | Jasper Johns, White Flag, 1955 | 157 |
25. | Jasper Johns, Alphabets, 1957 | 163 |
26. | Jasper Johns, Construction with Toy Piano, 1954 | 166 |
27. | Robert Rauschenberg, Untitled (Hotel Bilbao), 1952 | 167 |
28. | Marcel Duchamp, With Hidden Noise, 1916 | 169 |
29. | Robert Rauschenberg, Music Box (Elemental Sculpture), 1953 | 173 |
30. | Robert Rauschenberg, Paint Cans, 1954 | 175 |
31. | Jasper Johns, Painted Bronze, 1960 | 177 |
32. | Robert Rauschenberg, Monogram, 1955–9 | 179 |
33. | Robert Rauschenberg, Automobile Tire Print, 1951 | 181 |
34. | Paul Cézanne, Apples, c. 1878 | 186 |
35. | Jasper Johns, Painting with Two Balls, 1960 | 187 |
36. | Paul Cézanne, Portrait of Camille Pissarro, 1872–4 | 192 |
37. | Camille Pissarro, Portrait of Cézanne, 1874 | 193 |
38. | Camille Pissarro Bords de la Marne en hiver, 1866 | 205 |
39. | Robert Rauschenberg, Dirt Painting (For John Cage), ca. 1953 | 207 |
40. | Jasper Johns, Target with Plaster Casts, 1955 | 209 |
41. | Jasper Johns, Light Bulb II, 1958 | 221 |
42. | Robert Rauschenberg, Crocus, 1962 | 238 |
43. | Robert Rauschenberg, Bed, 1955 | 239 |
This book claims that the modern era – fraught with daunting challenges as it is – is still very much alive.
It rehearses two intuitions: the first from Kant, that one does not think (or create) as well alone as with others; the second from Fichte, that my freedom becomes explicit through the mediation of intersubjectivity, that is, that the condition of possibility of my freedom (especially here, as an artist) is that it be recognized by somebody else, and vice versa – a very timely concept today.
These two powerful intuitions are embodied throughout the making of modern art in the last two centuries: to take a metaphor close to Jasper Johns, it always takes two to tango. This book argues that, from beginning to end, modern art has been taking form through powerful artistic interchanges – such as the two examples (Cézanne/Pissarro and Johns/Rauschenberg) studied here.
Intersubjectivity is the subject of this book; it has also made this book possible. My vivid and warmest thanks go to Richard Shiff, as well as Michael Charlesworth, John Clarke, and Linda Henderson for accepting to read a very different and much larger version of this text as a Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Texas at Austin. I am also very grateful to Richard Brettell and Tzvetan Todorov for shaping up and critiquing the initial argument that led to this book. The theoretical argument of this book owes much to many people, namely Alain Renaut, Jean-Marc and Luc Ferry, Jean-Claude Lebensztejn, Yves Michaud, and Tzvetan Todorov, in France; Jürgen Habermas in Germany; and Michael Holquist, Thomas McCarthy, and Rudolf Makkreel, in this country. Thomas Crow, Elizabeth Easton, John Elderfield, Richard S. Field, Romy Golan, Jonathan Katz, Karen Lang, Fred Orton, Adrian Piper, Nan Rosenthal, Jennifer Russell, Richard Shiff, Claire Snollaerts, James Traub, Jayne Warman, Jonathan Weinberg, and Christopher Wood: each generously and critically contributed to various stages of this work. My warmest appreciation goes to Guy and Alec Wildenstein, of the Wildenstein Institute, and to Richard Rubin, Jack Flam, and Joan Banach, of the Dedalus Foundation, for their unwavering support throughout my research on this book.
I have benefited from discussions with students, at Yale University and at Hunter College. I am thankful to all of them, especially Allison Harding, Hiriko Ikegami, Jeremy Melius, Karen Paik, Allison Stites, and Tonya Vernooy.
I am deeply indebted to David White and Sarah Taggart for their invaluable help with research material related to Robert Rauschenberg’s and Jasper Johns’s works. Many thanks to the librarians of the Sterling Memorial Library, the Art and Architecture Library, and the Law Library at Yale University, and of the Avery Library and the Butler Library at Columbia University, as well as the librarians and archivists of The Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, The Museum of Modern Art, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and the Musée d’Orsay.
It has been a real joy to work with Beatrice Rehl, at Cambridge University Press: many thanks for her dedication to this project. Judeth Oden and Tonya Vernooy have spent boundless time and energy making this manuscript ready for publication: my deep gratitude to them. Many thanks, too, to Stephen Frankel for his editorial help.
Jasper Johns and Robert Rauschenberg both have been generous beyond words: this book owes them much more than words can say.
Finally, I feel a great personal and moral debt to my close family, especially to Annabel Daou, my wife, and Paul, our son: I dedicate this book to both of them.